you guys are wonderful

[MirS0bhan]

hi I'm in developing validata, something like attrs and pydantic but simple and without overhead
i have used your library for manage type validations but i have some problem. i see your half of code in validations is detecting what kind of type that is to get validate with appropriate validator. here we should define a validator_detector, because of the dataclass typing we have specified types and it will have overhead cause of validator detection. i think this could be solved. thank you guys

[sg495]

Happy to look into this! Could you please give us a small snippet of code which exemplifies the overhead you're experiencing?

[MirS0bhan]

in your code i see there is a lot of lines that supposed to detect the method to how validate the type.
so i think it could be better if you just create a validator function that gives a type and produce a validator for a specific type and that reduce the overhead of detecting type validator.

vltor = validator(List[int])
vltor([1,2,3])

[sg495]

That's a very good idea! I'll look into implementing it in the next release :)