You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on May 10, 2026. It is now read-only.
When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
Patches
A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
rather than exhausting the stack.
Workarounds
Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
time0.3.46Impact
When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
Patches
A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
rather than exhausting the stack.
Workarounds
Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.