Syntax style

[leaxoy]

As a Go developer, I've had enough of Go's current syntax. I really like your approach, but I have a suggestion.

I believe that if this project wants to attract Go developers, it should use mainstream Go syntax instead of making extensive modifications. Otherwise, it will drastically increase the mental burden on Go developers, hindering its promotion and appeal.

Some examples:
keywork: fn -> func
code block: task {} -> go func() {}
generics: let (tx, rx) = Channel.new<string>().split() -> tx, rx := Channel.new[string]().split()

from your code example in readme

[rsyring]

This should probably have been a Discussion instead of an issue. :)

[RestartFU]

I don't agree with that

I'm a go dev myself, I use it every day, my job is literally writing Go code

and what attracted me to lisette is that the syntax is more rust-like than it is go-like

I love the fact that I can use Go libraries with a syntax that has nothing to do with Go

[ivov]

Hi @leaxoy!

Lisette's syntax is mostly settled, but given your preference you might be interested in https://github.com/MadAppGang/dingo

Moving to a discussion