From 3d221a85527e3022a6280e729d25bc5cc50e5f56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: BIN Zhang Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 13:36:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update Review Pack V0.3 white paper canonical draft --- DEVELOPMENT_LEDGER.jsonl | 1 + DEVELOPMENT_LEDGER.md | 1 + .../review-pack-v0.3-white-paper-index.md | 34 ++++++++++++------- 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/DEVELOPMENT_LEDGER.jsonl b/DEVELOPMENT_LEDGER.jsonl index 2c61847..1c59f23 100644 --- a/DEVELOPMENT_LEDGER.jsonl +++ b/DEVELOPMENT_LEDGER.jsonl @@ -27,3 +27,4 @@ {"date":"2026-05-04","change_id":"p47-review-pack-v0.3-technical-note-v3","area":"docs","summary":"Added a docs-only v3 technical note for Review Pack V0.3.","agent_facing_impact":"Agents and reviewers get a tighter technical note with selected abstract, stable four-part contribution framing, compact diagrams, an evaluation evidence table, and preserved non-claims.","verification":"pytest -q, capabilities JSON parsing, metadata generation --check, ledger JSONL parse, boundary grep, git diff --check, and ruff.","evidence_integrity_impact":"Refines the writing artifact without code changes, release changes, OpenAPI/MCP changes, schema/core changes, external submission, or AI Act Pack implementation.","next_action":"Review v3 before deciding whether to prepare a repository white paper or Zenodo technical report package."} {"date":"2026-05-04","change_id":"p49-review-pack-v0.3-white-paper-index","area":"docs","summary":"Added a docs-only white paper index for Review Pack V0.3.","agent_facing_impact":"Agents and reviewers get a canonical reading entrypoint that identifies technical note v3, supporting materials, target readers, external-sharing checklist, DOI note, and claims boundaries.","verification":"pytest -q, capabilities JSON parsing, metadata generation --check, ledger JSONL parse, boundary grep, git diff --check, and ruff.","evidence_integrity_impact":"Organizes existing white paper material without code changes, release changes, OpenAPI/MCP changes, schema/core changes, external publication, or AI Act Pack implementation.","next_action":"Plan white paper polish before any Zenodo technical report, arXiv, workshop, or AI Act Pack decision."} {"date":"2026-05-04","change_id":"p51-review-pack-v0.3-technical-note-v3.1","area":"docs","summary":"Added a docs-only v3.1 technical note polish for Review Pack V0.3.","agent_facing_impact":"Agents and reviewers get refined abstract wording, consistent terminology, polished figure labels, stable contribution framing, retained evaluation evidence, and preserved non-claims.","verification":"pytest -q, capabilities JSON parsing, metadata generation --check, ledger JSONL parse, boundary grep, git diff --check, and ruff.","evidence_integrity_impact":"Polishes the writing artifact without code changes, release changes, OpenAPI/MCP changes, schema/core changes, external publication, or AI Act Pack implementation.","next_action":"Review v3.1 before deciding whether to update the white paper index canonical draft."} +{"date":"2026-05-04","change_id":"p53-white-paper-index-canonical-v3-1","area":"docs","summary":"Updated the Review Pack V0.3 white paper index canonical draft from v3 to v3.1.","agent_facing_impact":"Agents and reviewers now start from the polished v3.1 technical note while keeping v3, v2, and the submission plan as supporting background.","verification":"pytest -q, capabilities JSON parsing, metadata generation --check, ledger JSONL parse, index sanity check, boundary grep, git diff --check, and ruff.","evidence_integrity_impact":"Updates white paper navigation without code changes, release changes, OpenAPI/MCP changes, schema/core changes, external publication, or AI Act Pack implementation.","next_action":"Run post-merge index sanity before deciding on Chinese summary or Zenodo technical report planning."} diff --git a/DEVELOPMENT_LEDGER.md b/DEVELOPMENT_LEDGER.md index 70a8799..162ca06 100644 --- a/DEVELOPMENT_LEDGER.md +++ b/DEVELOPMENT_LEDGER.md @@ -57,3 +57,4 @@ generated agent metadata surfaces. | 2026-05-04 | p47-review-pack-v0.3-technical-note-v3 | docs | Added a docs-only v3 technical note for Review Pack V0.3. | Agents and reviewers get a tighter technical note with selected abstract, stable four-part contribution framing, compact diagrams, an evaluation evidence table, and preserved non-claims. | `pytest -q`, capabilities JSON parsing, metadata generation `--check`, ledger JSONL parse, boundary grep, `git diff --check`, and ruff. | Refines the writing artifact without code changes, release changes, OpenAPI/MCP changes, schema/core changes, external submission, or AI Act Pack implementation. | Review v3 before deciding whether to prepare a repository white paper or Zenodo technical report package. | | 2026-05-04 | p49-review-pack-v0.3-white-paper-index | docs | Added a docs-only white paper index for Review Pack V0.3. | Agents and reviewers get a canonical reading entrypoint that identifies technical note v3, supporting materials, target readers, external-sharing checklist, DOI note, and claims boundaries. | `pytest -q`, capabilities JSON parsing, metadata generation `--check`, ledger JSONL parse, boundary grep, `git diff --check`, and ruff. | Organizes existing white paper material without code changes, release changes, OpenAPI/MCP changes, schema/core changes, external publication, or AI Act Pack implementation. | Plan white paper polish before any Zenodo technical report, arXiv, workshop, or AI Act Pack decision. | | 2026-05-04 | p51-review-pack-v0.3-technical-note-v3.1 | docs | Added a docs-only v3.1 technical note polish for Review Pack V0.3. | Agents and reviewers get refined abstract wording, consistent terminology, polished figure labels, stable contribution framing, retained evaluation evidence, and preserved non-claims. | `pytest -q`, capabilities JSON parsing, metadata generation `--check`, ledger JSONL parse, boundary grep, `git diff --check`, and ruff. | Polishes the writing artifact without code changes, release changes, OpenAPI/MCP changes, schema/core changes, external publication, or AI Act Pack implementation. | Review v3.1 before deciding whether to update the white paper index canonical draft. | +| 2026-05-04 | p53-white-paper-index-canonical-v3-1 | docs | Updated the Review Pack V0.3 white paper index canonical draft from v3 to v3.1. | Agents and reviewers now start from the polished v3.1 technical note while keeping v3, v2, and the submission plan as supporting background. | `pytest -q`, capabilities JSON parsing, metadata generation `--check`, ledger JSONL parse, index sanity check, boundary grep, `git diff --check`, and ruff. | Updates white paper navigation without code changes, release changes, OpenAPI/MCP changes, schema/core changes, external publication, or AI Act Pack implementation. | Run post-merge index sanity before deciding on Chinese summary or Zenodo technical report planning. | diff --git a/docs/research/review-pack-v0.3-white-paper-index.md b/docs/research/review-pack-v0.3-white-paper-index.md index d017555..e801ba3 100644 --- a/docs/research/review-pack-v0.3-white-paper-index.md +++ b/docs/research/review-pack-v0.3-white-paper-index.md @@ -13,10 +13,11 @@ Pack. It does not add implementation scope or publication claims. Canonical draft: -- [Review Pack V0.3 Technical Note V3](review-pack-v0.3-technical-note-v3.md) +- [Review Pack V0.3 Technical Note V3.1](review-pack-v0.3-technical-note-v3.1.md) Supporting background: +- [Review Pack V0.3 Technical Note V3](review-pack-v0.3-technical-note-v3.md) - [Review Pack V0.3 Technical Note V2](review-pack-v0.3-technical-note-v2.md) - [Review Pack V0.3 Submission Plan](review-pack-v0.3-submission-plan.md) - [Operation Accountability Profile](operation-accountability-profile.md) @@ -24,17 +25,18 @@ Supporting background: - [Strategic Positioning](../strategic-positioning.md) - [Review Pack Minimal Cookbook](../cookbooks/review_pack_minimal.md) -The current recommendation is to treat V3 as the canonical repository white -paper draft. No immediate V3.1 is required. A Zenodo technical report should -wait until one more refinement cycle. arXiv and workshop submission remain -deferred. +The current recommendation is to treat V3.1 as the canonical repository white +paper draft. V3 remains a previous draft and supporting background. V2 remains +supporting background. The submission plan remains planning background. A +Zenodo technical report should wait until one more refinement cycle. arXiv and +workshop submission remain deferred. ## Reading Order 1. [Strategic Positioning](../strategic-positioning.md) - Start here to understand the project boundary after v0.6.0: local evidence export, validation, verification, and review packaging. -2. [Review Pack V0.3 Technical Note V3](review-pack-v0.3-technical-note-v3.md) +2. [Review Pack V0.3 Technical Note V3.1](review-pack-v0.3-technical-note-v3.1.md) - Read this as the canonical technical note draft and repository white paper seed. 3. [Review Pack Minimal Cookbook](../cookbooks/review_pack_minimal.md) @@ -50,6 +52,10 @@ deferred. - Read this before external sharing to check target readers, contribution framing, figures, evaluation evidence, and claims boundaries. +Previous drafts V3 and V2 remain useful supporting background when reviewing +how the technical note was compressed and polished, but V3.1 is the current +canonical draft. + ## Target Readers Primary readers: @@ -86,8 +92,8 @@ implemented contributions: 1. A local verify-first / fail-closed Review Pack artifact model for signed agent evidence bundles. -2. A dual human/agent review surface: `summary.md` plus `manifest.json`, - `receipt.json`, and `findings.json`. +2. A dual human/tool-using-agent review surface: `summary.md` plus + `manifest.json`, `receipt.json`, and `findings.json`. 3. Stable `RP-CHECK-*` reviewer checklist IDs and bounded findings/severity model. 4. Conservative safety boundaries: no private key copying, no network @@ -143,15 +149,17 @@ external sharing language. ## Next Writing Step -Recommended next phase: +Recommended next phase after this index update: ```text -P50 Review Pack V0.3 white paper polish planning +P54 Review Pack V0.3 white paper index post-merge sanity ``` -P50 should decide whether to prepare a V3.1 draft, refine diagrams, select the -final abstract for external sharing, and decide whether and when to create a -Zenodo technical report. arXiv and workshop submission should remain deferred. +After post-merge sanity, the next writing-planning decision should be whether +to prepare a concise Chinese summary or to plan a Zenodo technical report. The +current recommendation is to consider Chinese summary planning first. Zenodo +technical report, arXiv submission, and workshop submission should remain +deferred until a separate readiness decision. Do not make AI Act Pack implementation the next step.