Skip to content

Macros or multiple includes? #40

@kpu

Description

@kpu

We have two means of creating functions for different architectures: macros (as currently used for multiplication) and repeated inclusion (as currently used for kernels). They're both sort of hacky, but I think multiple inclusion is cleaner. It lets us have a function without a backslash at the end of the line and edit it like a function. Can we switch multiply to be multiple inclusion?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions