Canvas Link
https://learning.flatironschool.com/courses/5187/pages/enumerables-debugging-with-pry?module_item_id=397762
Concern
with the phrase "add this code to the method", are you suggesting to add a second instance of #reverse_each_word ?
That's possible, and the second instance will clobber the first, so it works:
require 'pry'
def reverse_each_word(sentence)
binding.pry
end
def reverse_each_word(sentence)
words = sentence.split
end
reverse_each_word("Hello there, and how are you?")
But are you expecting students to update the method rather than add?
Additional Context
No response
Suggested Changes
As a student, I'm moving right along, so if the docs say I should add, that's what I'll do. But then I notice it's already there and I have to wonder whether the course author meant for me to update the method, which seems more likely.
So now I'm busy thinking about stuff which is not the main point of the lab. With so much going on in Phase 3 and Ruby, this is an unnecessary distraction.
I leave it to you regarding appropriate updates to make to "add this code to the method"
Canvas Link
https://learning.flatironschool.com/courses/5187/pages/enumerables-debugging-with-pry?module_item_id=397762
Concern
with the phrase "add this code to the method", are you suggesting to add a second instance of #reverse_each_word ?
That's possible, and the second instance will clobber the first, so it works:
But are you expecting students to update the method rather than add?
Additional Context
No response
Suggested Changes
As a student, I'm moving right along, so if the docs say I should add, that's what I'll do. But then I notice it's already there and I have to wonder whether the course author meant for me to update the method, which seems more likely.
So now I'm busy thinking about stuff which is not the main point of the lab. With so much going on in Phase 3 and Ruby, this is an unnecessary distraction.
I leave it to you regarding appropriate updates to make to "add this code to the method"