Hi authors, thanks for releasing the code and data for M2E2. I have a question regarding the mapping between imSitu event types and M2E2 event types mentioned in the paper.
In the paper “Cross-media Structured Common Space for Multimedia Event Extraction”, it states that 98 of 504 imSitu event (verb) types are aligned with the 8 event types in M2E2 (Table 1 / Section 2.2).
Could you please clarify:
Where is this 98 → 8 event-type-level alignment implemented or listed?
Is there a specific file or script that contains the full list of 98 aligned imSitu verbs and their corresponding M2E2 event types?
I checked the file:
data/ace/ace_sr_mapping.txt
([https://github.com/limanling/m2e2/blob/master/data/ace/ace_sr_mapping.txt]
This file provides mappings of imSitu verb + SR role → ACE/M2E2 event type + role.
However, after deduplicating verbs in this file, I only found 67 unique verbs, not 98.
So I’m wondering:
Is ace_sr_mapping.txt intended to be the full 98-verb alignment?
If not, where can I find the remaining aligned verbs (event-type alignment without role mapping), or how were they filtered out?
Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Best regards
Hi authors, thanks for releasing the code and data for M2E2. I have a question regarding the mapping between imSitu event types and M2E2 event types mentioned in the paper.
In the paper “Cross-media Structured Common Space for Multimedia Event Extraction”, it states that 98 of 504 imSitu event (verb) types are aligned with the 8 event types in M2E2 (Table 1 / Section 2.2).
Could you please clarify:
Where is this 98 → 8 event-type-level alignment implemented or listed?
Is there a specific file or script that contains the full list of 98 aligned imSitu verbs and their corresponding M2E2 event types?
I checked the file:
data/ace/ace_sr_mapping.txt
([https://github.com/limanling/m2e2/blob/master/data/ace/ace_sr_mapping.txt]
This file provides mappings of imSitu verb + SR role → ACE/M2E2 event type + role.
However, after deduplicating verbs in this file, I only found 67 unique verbs, not 98.
So I’m wondering:
Is ace_sr_mapping.txt intended to be the full 98-verb alignment?
If not, where can I find the remaining aligned verbs (event-type alignment without role mapping), or how were they filtered out?
Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Best regards