Solution#947
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Thank you for your work! Your implementation of splitInteger meets almost all requirements, but there is a critical issue: the output array is not guaranteed to be sorted in ascending order, which is a strict requirement of the task. Please update your function to sort the result before returning it. Once this is fixed, your solution will fully meet the task requirements. Keep up the good work—you're almost there! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
|
|
||
| test('should sort parts ascending if they are not equal', () => { | ||
|
|
||
| expect(splitInteger(17, 4)).toEqual([4, 4, 4, 5]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Issue: The expectation in this test assumes the result should be sorted in ascending order ([4, 4, 4, 5]), but the splitInteger implementation returns parts in the order they are calculated, which would be [5, 4, 4, 4]. If the task requires sorted output, you should either sort the result in the implementation or adjust the test expectation to match the actual output. Please check the task description or checklist for clarification on the required order.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great job! 🎉 Your implementation and tests for splitInteger now fully meet all the core requirements and constraints of the task. The function behaves as expected, and your tests are comprehensive and well-aligned with the specifications. Keep up the excellent work!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.