Replies: 1 comment
-
|
The maintainers are discussing this as a proposal right now. We will need a bit of time to consider the breadth of workflows we're trying to support, and the importance of human-in-the-loop for certain scales of implementation. There is some merit here for cloud agents and providing them specific commit points based on an implementation plan. But I will also say that for myself, I still prefer to set the commit points and drive them with intention. thinking this over |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🎯 Summary
This proposal suggests evolving the current "conservative feedback" approach in task-oriented agents to a more proactive automation model where agents automatically execute git commits after completing each implementation phase.
🔍 Context & Current Behavior
Currently, when agents (such as task/implementation-focused agents) complete a phase:
💡 Proposed Enhancement
Introduce an option for agents to proactively execute git commits upon phase completion by leveraging the existing
git-commitskill.🚀 Benefits
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions