RES and CONV PP related issues (dp v0.3)

[nesnoj]

This issue is to collect RES and CONV PP-related bugs we found recently. Please tick here if resolved and close related issue.

• Fix changing ids of conv generators in different scenarios changing ids of conv generators in different scenarios #175 @wolfbunke v0.3.0
• RES generators in the sea (not wind offshore) RES generators in the sea (not wind offshore) #176 @wolfbunke v0.3.1
• Decommissioning of conv. PP decommissioning of conv. PP #178 @wolfbunke v0.3.0
• Bug in v_level of generators bug in v_level of generators #179 @IlkaCu v0.3.1
• Move pre-data_processing of RES and Conv Power plants to DP (bug in version no.) Move pre-data_processing of RES and Conv Power plants to DP? #180 @wolfbunke @ulfmueller @IlkaCu v0.3.1
• RES PP with capacity=0 RES PP with capacity=0 #182 @wolfbunke v0.3.0
• Missing subst_id in commissioned RES Missing subst_id in commissioned RES #184 @wolfbunke v0.3.0
• Validate new tables - Re-check if above bugs are resolved @wolfbunke v0.3.0 & v0.3.1
• Check and update supply tables check and update supply tables #166 @wolfbunke v0.3.0
• Documentation: The current method how tables/mviews are created, which data is used, filtered etc. should be documented somewhere...at least, the BPMN should be updated and it should be documented how the scenarios are created (I already had a bunch of people who wanted to use the datasets from OEP asking amny questions I could not answer ).. @wolfbunke v0.3.0
  Logic: SQ = SQ, SQ +NEP = NEP, SQ+NEP +eGO 100 = eGo 100

If I forgot about something, please amend list.

[nesnoj]

One more question @IlkaCu @wolfbunke:
Does the v_level change in future scenarios if the increasing capacity of a PP exceeds the threshold of the next voltage level (according to our table)?

[wolfbunke]

Thx, @nesnoj, I updated the version numbering and continue with this list on the next days.

[nesnoj]

Thx!
Uh, now it seems I do not have sufficient privileges to access the mviews - please update the ownership to oeuser!

[nesnoj]

Does the v_level change in future scenarios if the increasing capacity of a PP exceeds the threshold of the next voltage level (according to our table)?

I had a chat with @wolfbunke:

• RES: Wind and PV are extended by using new PP only -> no v_level change!
• RES: Water and Biomass are extended by updating capacities as well as new PP -> v_level changes may occur
• CONV: Both, new PP as well as updated capacities -> v_level changes may occur no v_level change!

I hope I got this right, @wolfbunke ?

EDITED according to comment below: #181 (comment)

[wolfbunke]

yes, from my part of scripts. I am not sure if @IlkaCu is using a script in dp in order to change the v_level by our size assumption later on?

[IlkaCu]

Sorry for not answering earlier.
In the code we make sure that all conventional power plants keep the same voltage level in all scenarios regardless of whether their capacity changes or not.