Requirements editing needs to be simplified for editors

[ogcscotts]

The structure for authoring Requirements (and thus Conformance statements and classes for both) is complicated for editors. The DocTeam is requesting proposals for a more simple means to edit this information.

Please suggest the most intuitive way for editors to create this information.

Two end results are likely:

1. Metanorma is updated to reflect the new content model; or
2. A parsing tool must be developed to extract the Requirements information and create the Metanorma files.

[ghobona]

Discussed 2024-09-09

@opoudjis is going to create a ticket, in the metanorma-ogc repo, outlining a proposed workflow.

@ogcscotts will invite OGC Members to provide feedback during the 130th OGC Member Meeting.

[opoudjis]

Proposal is in metanorma/metanorma-ogc#716

It is conditional on the implementation of metanorma/modspec-ruby#2, the integration of YAML into Metanorma via an object model (although the workaround via Liquid that we have already published will still work.)