Is there a syntax error in "ofGraphType"?

[KardEvil]

When I tried to parse the following statement, it generated a syntax tree that did not meet expectations:
CREATE GRAPH /my_schema/my_object.my_graph.
I expected to get a schema, an object, and a graphName under catalogGraphParentAndName, but I got ofGraphType.

[mburbidg]

Let me take a look this week.

[mburbidg]

This is a valid statement, but does not do what you were expecting it would do. I posted the following in a discussion on basecamp, if you have access you can weigh in on the discussion.

Consider the following :

CREATE GRAPH /foo/bar

This is a valid statement, but does not do what it appears to do. It creates a new typed graph using a graph type reference for the graph type.

If the statement is formatted as follows, it is more obvious what this statement does. i.e. foo is the name of the new graph and /bar is a reference to the graph type.

CREATE GRAPH /foo /bar

Someone logged this as a issue against the ANTLR grammar. They were erroneously expecting this to create an open graph named bar, in the schema named foo.

Adding ANY to that statement gets them what they expect.

CREATE GRAPH /foo/bar ANY

But I think it points out that the GQL syntax in this case is confusing at the best. I think making TYPED (::) mandatory would help clear this up, as in the following.

CREATE GRAPH /foo TYPED /bar

or

CREATE GRAPH /foo :: /bar

[KardEvil]

Thank you for your response. I made some modifications to the statement, and by making TYPED mandatory in both openGraphType and ofGraphType, this misunderstanding can be eliminated.