Not an issue but more of a question.
From the docs the client config at ~/.opk/config.yml and the server config at /etc/opk/config.yml don't overlap. So a client config is required if the providers used are not the default ones.
I would like to propose/query if it's possible to enforce the client config systemwide so that the users don't have to necessarily have a config file for the admin defined providers.
This way the admin defines/enforces a set of providers that the users can use (for example, internal SSO and Google ) and users don't have to worry about setting up the config themselves. This is similar to how conda enforces systemwide configuration that conflicts with the user defined ones. https://docs.conda.io/projects/conda/en/stable/user-guide/configuration/admin-multi-user-install.html#example-administrator-controlled-installation
Or if all of this is possible already, please let me know.
Thanks!
Not an issue but more of a question.
From the docs the client config at
~/.opk/config.ymland the server config at/etc/opk/config.ymldon't overlap. So a client config is required if the providers used are not the default ones.I would like to propose/query if it's possible to enforce the client config systemwide so that the users don't have to necessarily have a config file for the admin defined providers.
This way the admin defines/enforces a set of providers that the users can use (for example, internal SSO and Google ) and users don't have to worry about setting up the config themselves. This is similar to how conda enforces systemwide configuration that conflicts with the user defined ones. https://docs.conda.io/projects/conda/en/stable/user-guide/configuration/admin-multi-user-install.html#example-administrator-controlled-installation
Or if all of this is possible already, please let me know.
Thanks!