Replies: 4 comments 15 replies
-
|
4 it's the best and easiest version.
…On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 8:02 PM Gekko Wrld ***@***.***> wrote:
I have looked at the org an there seems to be more than one version of the
language (Csq3 and Csq4). Should I use 3 or 4?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#43>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVUBSDVY7V3JIKOVIBTC3HTXKHPA5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAY7MPFIE>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is 3 still in active development (if any at all?) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hello @AniketKumar2500 I have tried the build steps Then I run into |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
And it's not any problem instead you have not used it correctly and the change you have done are quite dangerous since the logic is overruled. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have looked at the org an there seems to be more than one version of the language (Csq3 and Csq4). Should I use 3 or 4?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions