From cda9d774193ed80b2b82f0d19aac5627e20a7fdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pcvantol Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:09:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs: record Forge 2.7.25 Mission 3 preflight --- BOOTSTRAP.md | 5 + ..._2_7_25_PREFLIGHT_ACCEPTANCE_2026_09_18.md | 241 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 246 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/operations/MISSION_3_FORGE_2_7_25_PREFLIGHT_ACCEPTANCE_2026_09_18.md diff --git a/BOOTSTRAP.md b/BOOTSTRAP.md index 20ba454..dbb7133 100644 --- a/BOOTSTRAP.md +++ b/BOOTSTRAP.md @@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ binds the protected implementation and updater deliveries, exact published Forge 2.7.25 artifacts, safe schema 38→39 activation, preservation and normal installed readback. It does not authorize a reset or Mission 3. +The separately authorized Forge 2.7.25 Mission-3 acceptance preflight is +recorded in [Mission 3 on Forge 2.7.25 — blocked before T0](docs/operations/MISSION_3_FORGE_2_7_25_PREFLIGHT_ACCEPTANCE_2026_09_18.md). +It preserves PR #148, performs no reset or Mission allocation, and records the +failed functional-evidence-fit and autonomous installed-ingress conditions. + ## Previous pickup checkpoint — 17 September 2026 Implementation PR #128 merged the deterministic aggregate-health timeout-boundary diff --git a/docs/operations/MISSION_3_FORGE_2_7_25_PREFLIGHT_ACCEPTANCE_2026_09_18.md b/docs/operations/MISSION_3_FORGE_2_7_25_PREFLIGHT_ACCEPTANCE_2026_09_18.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dd6b611 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/operations/MISSION_3_FORGE_2_7_25_PREFLIGHT_ACCEPTANCE_2026_09_18.md @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ +AUTONOMY_E2E_ACCEPTANCE = NIET_GEHAALD + +# Mission 3 on Forge 2.7.25 — blocked before T0 + +Read-only acceptance preflight on 18 September 2026. This is a new assessment +of the corrected Forge 2.7.25 installation. It does not reopen or rewrite the +historical Mission-3 rejection in PR #148. + +```text +MISSION_SCOPE_EVIDENCE_FIT = FAIL +PREPARATION_ACCEPTANCE = NIET_GEHAALD +CLEAN_CENTRAL_PREFLIGHT = NIET_GEHAALD +MISSION_EXECUTION_STATE = NIET_GESTART +AUTONOMY_LOOP_ACCEPTANCE = NIET_GEHAALD +TELEMETRY_ACCEPTANCE = NIET_GEHAALD +REPORTING_ACCEPTANCE = NIET_GEHAALD +EXPORT_ACCEPTANCE = NIET_GEHAALD +PUBLIC_HANDOFF_DELIVERY = PENDING_PROTECTED_MERGE +SUPPORTED_CRITERION_SOURCE = repository_json +AUTHORITATIVE_HOST_CONTROL_SUPPORT = UNSUPPORTED +E2E_EXECUTION_AND_REVIEW_EVIDENCE = SEPARATE_EP_EVIDENCE_LINE_NOT_EXERCISED +``` + +## Decisive pre-T0 findings + +Two independent start conditions fail before destructive maintenance is +permitted. + +First, the available `repository_json` source proves only an approved JSON +property at an exact accepted revision. The read-only scope survey considered +real open Forge work including the installed inner-loop CI seam and governed +progression. Those outcomes require proof of process continuity, execution, +validation, review or decision enforcement. Representing them as JSON fields +would weaken their functional meaning. `host_control` remains +`UNSATISFIED / UNSUPPORTED_AUTHORITATIVE_EVIDENCE_SOURCE`. No toy, +acceptance-only or unused configuration objective was substituted. + +Second, the exact installed package contains the documented +`InstalledDynamicMissionRuntime` Python API and `ForgeRuntimeService.serve`, +but the published distribution exposes one console entry point whose supported +commands are storage initialization/status/reset and Execution Host +configuration/preflight. It exposes no Mission-governance, intake, start or +supervised-service command. The public `start` and `resume` methods each drive +one service tick. A new test-session script that repeatedly called those +methods or private composition helpers would be a new controller, not the +existing qualified product route. It therefore could not prove the required +absence of human/external between-Action steering in C07. + +The installed Forge-to-EP authenticated read-only preflight did pass after the +normal Keychain-backed credential was resolved. It reported EP 2.3.83, +producer-readback 1.2, terminal-evidence 1.4, matching project/repository scope +and submission authorization. Cryptographic peer identity remains +`NOT_ASSERTED`. This successful read-only check does not cure either start +condition and created no submission. + +In accordance with the assignment, the first failed start condition froze the +verdict. No reset, Mission allocation, governance decision, Mission Intake, +planner invocation, provider invocation or EP execution was attempted. + +## A. Exact installation manifest + +| Product | Active version | Schema | Product release source | Published wheel SHA-256 | Readback | +| --- | --- | ---: | --- | --- | --- | +| Forge | 2.7.25 | 39 | `61e02899277d4ee557696bb24a051916e8c961c2` | `e0ea58bf6ce242d4eca66801ef4c764c7104b90df5503141a8ebf0006c1aa7b8` | normal executable reports 2.7.25; installed isolated interpreter/distribution and schema read back | +| Engineering Platform | 2.3.83 | 68 | `13691e4502c239e03558a9c79538ae9b7387938f` | `006b47b8a864502a4b4596ba17e2724fe6ddba1e932615e183841cfc913e5021` | authenticated declaration through normal Forge peer preflight | + +The selected reset coordinator remains +`cross-product-operational-reset-coordinator-v2`, bound by the completion +record to EP source `13691e4502c239e03558a9c79538ae9b7387938f` and artifact SHA-256 +`bdfece75b538994a59dc295ab10d4dac6bdfbfcb1a45c36c7e392c4dbcc82acc`. +It was not invoked. Fresh remote observations resolved Forge `main` to +`fd69c443da80c56f11361693fd8ded6e1b20fc3f` and EP `main` to +`13691e4502c239e03558a9c79538ae9b7387938f`. + +The Forge completion record in PR #152 and its installed readback remain the +owning qualification evidence. The present preflight independently confirmed +the active version/schema, installed command surface, package entry point and +authenticated peer contract. It performed no rebuild, downgrade, update or +installation. + +## B. Evidence fit and functional Mission + +No functional Mission was approved or allocated. The read-only candidate +survey deliberately stopped before converting an objective into product state. + +| Surveyed real objective | Real consumer meaning | Why the available criterion source is insufficient | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Installed inner-loop CI closure | one installed Mission continuously plans, executes, observes evidence and progresses across real process/EP boundaries | requires execution, restart, timing, validation and review evidence; JSON structure cannot prove those events | +| Governed progression successor fence | Forge blocks/releases successor work from authentic decisions and exact evidence | requires enforcement and replay behavior, not a declarative PASS field | + +The only supported criterion source is `repository_json` with exact repository, +safe path, JSON pointer, canonical expected value and an approved validity +policy. It could support a genuinely structural product property, but none of +the surveyed open outcomes could be reduced to that property without dropping +necessary behavior. No `CriterionAssessmentContract`, requirement identity, +predicate or validity binding was therefore approved for a Mission. This is a +failed evidence-fit precondition, not a defect claim about every possible +future Forge objective. + +## C. Reset manifest and clean baseline + +The installed Forge reset preview was read-only and returned `READY`, schema +39, dataset generation 0, intact integrity checks, no foreign-key finding and +no active maintenance operation. It also reported retained operational history: +3 Mission states, 2 Action derivations, 2 derivation results, 1 planning state, +8 execution-host bindings and their associated audit/history records. + +Because evidence fit and autonomous ingress failed first: + +- the joint coordinator was not invoked; +- no reset authorization, prepare, backup, revalidate, apply, verify, resume, + finish or service stop/start occurred; +- no EP reset preview was promoted to a joint plan; +- no fresh coordinated backup set was created; +- dataset generations stayed unchanged; +- preserved identities, policy, credentials, security ledgers and allocators + were not mutated; +- no clean-baseline or anti-reingestion claim is made. + +Therefore `CLEAN_CENTRAL_PREFLIGHT = NIET_GEHAALD`. Historical reset receipts +and installation backups were not reused as current reset evidence. + +## D. Measurement manifest + +| Field | Result | +| --- | --- | +| Intended display label | Mission 3 | +| Intended allocator result | `MISSION-0003` | +| Actual Mission ID | none | +| Functional input/criteria | not approved; evidence-fit failed | +| Initial governance decisions | none | +| T0 | not set | +| End time | not applicable; no measured attempt | +| Repository Truth binding | current Forge main observed read-only; not bound to a Mission | +| Test-contract population | C01-C20 retained outside runtime; no Mission population created | + +The normal allocator was not called, so no identity was forced or predicted +from repository-document naming. + +## E–F. Actions and A-to-B evidence + +| Action ID | Contribution | Planner invocation | Predecessor evidence | Baseline | Submission / EP run | Candidate / reviews | Delivery / criteria / reconciliation | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| none | none derived | none | none | none | none | none | none | + +There is no A-to-B sequence, partial assessment, remaining-requirement set, +successor planner input/output or second delivery. None is reconstructed from +the source qualification scenarios: those scenarios used external planner, +repository and host fixtures and explicitly did not make a live submission. + +## G. Counts + +| Item | New-attempt count | +| --- | ---: | +| Missions allocated/admitted | 0 | +| substantive Actions | 0 | +| planner/provider invocations | 0 | +| original submissions / EP runs | 0 / 0 | +| retries / resumes / repairs | 0 / 0 / 0 | +| initial Mission decisions | 0 | +| human interventions after Mission release | not applicable; no release | +| new terminal evidence conflicts | not assessable; no new population | + +Zeros are preparation facts only. They are not autonomy, no-retry, telemetry or +quality PASS evidence. + +## H. Telemetry, performance and canonical reporting + +There is no new Mission population from which to calculate planning usage, +Action usage, token/cache aggregation, invocation timing, external wait, +review/finalization share or Mission duration. Every such value is +`UNAVAILABLE: NO_MEASURED_ATTEMPT`, not zero. EP usage is not substituted for +Forge planning usage. + +No new Engineering Report, Action Quality/Security result, finalization receipt, +Forge criterion observation or Mission result exists. Desktop/mobile dashboard +acceptance was not run because there is no selected attempt/chain. This is not +a dashboard-defect finding. + +## I. Four telemetry downloads + +| Export | Downloaded | Snapshot | Result | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| EX-OV-MD | no | none | not executable without a new Mission population | +| EX-OV-JSON | no | none | not executable without a new Mission population | +| EX-DT-MD | no | none | no selected attempt/chain | +| EX-DT-JSON | no | none | no selected attempt/chain | + +No dummy run, old snapshot or administrative report was relabeled as a required +telemetry download. Parse, MIME, filename, parity and completeness are therefore +unproven. + +## J. C01–C20 + +`NIET_GEHAALD` for an unexecuted criterion means not proven; it is not by itself +a separate product-defect classification. + +| Criterion | Result | Owning evidence or missing part | +| --- | --- | --- | +| C01 — exactly one fresh Mission | NIET_GEHAALD | no allocation, approval, intake or T0 | +| C02 — real authorized functional work | NIET_GEHAALD | no objective could be approved without weakening required evidence | +| C03 — at least two substantive Actions | NIET_GEHAALD | no Actions | +| C04 — Actions derived by the real planner | NIET_GEHAALD | no planner invocation | +| C05 — new planning after predecessor evidence | NIET_GEHAALD | no predecessor evidence or successor decision | +| C06 — installed Keychain→HTTP→EP execution/readback | NIET_GEHAALD | authenticated read-only preflight passed; Mission execution/readback did not occur | +| C07 — no human between-step steering | NIET_GEHAALD | no delivered autonomous Mission service/controller entry; a new tick-driving script was rejected | +| C08 — zero retries/resumes/repairs | NIET_GEHAALD | no execution; a zero count is not a successful no-retry trial | +| C09 — first-candidate validation and independent Quality/Security | NIET_GEHAALD | no candidate or Action assurance | +| C10 — protected implementation/finalization/terminal evidence | NIET_GEHAALD | no Action delivery | +| C11 — identities/digests/baselines/receipts close | NIET_GEHAALD | installation bindings close; Mission/Action/run chain absent | +| C12 — no unresolved new evidence conflicts | NIET_GEHAALD | no new terminal population to assess | +| C13 — Forge assesses and closes Mission | NIET_GEHAALD | no Mission; evidence-fit failed before approval | +| C14 — safe declared post-execution state | NIET_GEHAALD | read-only safe stop established, but no executed Mission end state exists | +| C15 — exact qualified Forge/EP installation active before T0 | GEHAALD | Forge 2.7.25/schema39 and EP 2.3.83/schema68 bindings plus authenticated compatibility readback | +| C16 — correct live telemetry | NIET_GEHAALD | no new telemetry population | +| C17 — correct desktop/mobile dashboard chain | NIET_GEHAALD | no new attempt/chain | +| C18 — four consistent telemetry exports | NIET_GEHAALD | none downloaded; no valid snapshot | +| C19 — both CENTRAL datasets clean with fresh backups | NIET_GEHAALD | reset/backups intentionally not executed; Forge still contains old operational history | +| C20 — only new-attempt measurement | NIET_GEHAALD | no new measured population or post-reset anti-reingestion proof | + +## K. Scoped resource handoff + +Lane 1 records the assignment as a read-only pre-T0 preflight with terminal +`BLOCKED_BEFORE_T0`. Lane 2 revision 14 was read back as having no active +assignment or reservation. No maintenance/test window was entered because no +writer stop or product mutation was permitted after the evidence-fit failure. + +Effects owned by this assessment are limited to read-only source/installation, +lane and preflight observations plus this sanitized documentation delivery. +There are no Mission/Action/provider/EP subprocesses, submissions, runs, +mutating reset operations, service changes, credentials changes, backups or +runtime reservations to hand off. The documentation branch/PR is administrative +and is not an Engineering Action or evidence repair. + +Exact local paths, runtime/instance/consumer identities, Keychain references, +plan/database/backup digests and raw receipts remain outside Git. Public +product versions, source commits, artifact digests and protected PR identities +remain exact. + +No repair campaign, production patch, second reset/Mission attempt or next +backlog Mission follows from this result.