{card.description}
-- Use Prometheus for infrastructure and Kubernetes metrics where volume is highest. Keep a commercial tool for APM/tracing if needed. Use Grafana as the unified dashboard layer across both. -
-{card.description}
-- Start with ambient mode for L4 mTLS and identity. No sidecars, minimal overhead. Add L7 waypoint proxies only for namespaces that need traffic management or rich authorization. You don't have to mesh everything on day one. -
-{card.description}
-- Prometheus with Thanos Sidecar in each cluster, metrics shipped to S3/GCS via Thanos Store Gateway, Compactor handling downsampling and retention, and Thanos Query sitting in front of everything for a unified PromQL endpoint. Grafana dashboards point at Thanos Query instead of individual Prometheus instances. -
-- Deep-dive services for teams with specific .NET challenges. -
-{service.description}
- - {service.label} - - -- Domain expertise that accelerates delivery and reduces risk. -
-{industry.description}
-The right tool for the job, not the trendy one.
-{row.need}
-{row.fit}
-- Not always the right call for CPU-intensive processing like video encoding or ML model training, or for teams deeply invested in Python or Java with no JavaScript experience. We'll tell you upfront if something else fits better. -
-- We've recommended Python and Go over Node.js when the workload demanded it. -
-The most popular frontend library isn't always the right one.
-{row.need}
-{row.fit}
-- If SEO and page speed are your top priority, Next.js gives you server-side rendering, static generation, and edge functions built on React. For structured enterprise apps with strict conventions, Angular provides routing, forms, and dependency injection out of the box. Need a lightweight backend to pair with React? Node.js or Python depending on your workload. Not sure? That's what our architecture consultation is for. -
-The right tool for the job. Not the trendy one.
-{row.need}
-{row.fit}
-- Need raw API throughput without the Python ecosystem? Node.js with NestJS or Fastify handles I/O-bound workloads with a lighter runtime. Building a frontend-heavy application where the backend is thin? Next.js API routes might be all you need. CPU-intensive work like video encoding or real-time game servers? Go or Rust will outperform Python. Not sure? That's what our architecture consultation is for. -
-The right framework for the job. Not the trending one.
-{row.situation}
-{row.fit}
-- Building a content-heavy marketing site? Next.js is likely a better fit. Need a lightweight, flexible UI for a smaller team? React with Vite gives you more freedom with less structure. Internal tool with simple CRUD? React or even a low-code solution might be faster. Not sure? That's what our architecture consultation is for - we've recommended against Angular when it wasn't the right call. -
-The right framework for the job, not the trendy one.
-{row.need}
-{row.fit}
-- Flutter isn't the right call for every project. Apps that need deep platform-native UI (following iOS HIG or Material Design exactly), or teams with existing React/JavaScript expertise where React Native would reuse skills better. We'll tell you upfront if something else fits. -
- -We build with both. Here's how we decide.
-Best for
-{fw.bestFor}
-Why
-{fw.why}
-We use it when
-{fw.useWhen}
-- Many projects use both. A public marketing site on Next.js, an authenticated dashboard on React + Vite, sharing the same component library and design system. We architect for this pattern regularly. -
-We use all three. Here's how we decide.
-Best for
-{fw.bestFor}
-Why
-{fw.why}
-We use it when
-{fw.useWhen}
-- Most projects aren't purely one framework. We've built systems where Django handles the main app, FastAPI serves the ML inference endpoints, and Flask runs lightweight webhook handlers. The framework follows the workload. -
-We build with both. Here's how we decide.
-Best for
-{fw.bestFor}
-Why
-{fw.why}
-We use it when
-{fw.useWhen}
-- Some projects use both. A Flutter mobile app for the consumer experience, a React Native companion for a partner-facing tool sharing the same backend. We architect for this when it makes sense. -
-The right framework for the job, not the trending one.
-{row.situation}
-{row.fit}
-- If your app is primarily 3D/gaming (Unity or native), needs extreme low-level hardware access (Bluetooth LE edge cases, heavy AR), or your team is already deep in Dart, you may want to explore Flutter or go fully native. For SEO-critical marketing sites, Next.js is the better call. For complex backend needs alongside your mobile app, see our Node.js and Python services. -
-We build with both. Here's how we decide.
-Best for
-{fw.bestFor}
-Why
-{fw.why}
-Key context
-{fw.useWhen}
-- Many companies use both. React Native for business apps where platform-native feel matters, Flutter for consumer apps where custom UI is the priority. We build with both - see our Flutter services. -
-Every tool earns its place. Here's what we ship with and why.
-| Layer | -Tools | -Why | -
|---|---|---|
| {row.layer} | -{row.tools} | -{row.why} | -
- We pick the framework based on your constraints. NestJS for enterprise structure, Fastify for raw throughput, Express for ecosystem breadth. There is no single right answer. -
-Every tool earns its place. Here's what we ship with and why.
-| Layer | -Tools | -Why | -
|---|---|---|
| {row.layer} | -{row.tools} | -{row.why} | -
- We pick the tooling based on your project. A dashboard doesn't need Next.js and Vercel - React + Vite + CloudFront is faster to build and cheaper to run. A marketing site doesn't need Redux - server state with React Query is enough. The stack follows the problem. -
-Every tool earns its place. Here's what we ship with and why.
-| Layer | -Tools | -Why | -
|---|---|---|
| {row.layer} | -{row.tools} | -{row.why} | -
- We pick the framework based on your constraints. Django if your team needs structure and a built-in admin. FastAPI if throughput and async matter. Flask if simplicity and a small footprint are the priority. There is no single right answer. -
-Every tool earns its place. Here's what we ship with and why.
-| Layer | -Tools | -Why We Chose Them | -
|---|---|---|
| {row.layer} | -{row.tools} | -{row.why} | -
- We use Angular Material where it fits and swap in PrimeNG when the project needs data tables, tree views, or complex form controls that Material doesn't cover well. No dogma about component libraries - we pick what serves the project. -
-Every tool earns its place. Here's what we ship with.
-| Layer | -What We Use | -
|---|---|
| {row.layer} | -{row.tools} | -
Every tool earns its place. Here's what we ship with.
-| Layer | -What We Use | -
|---|---|
| {row.layer} | -{row.tools} | -
- We pick state management based on your project complexity. BLoC for enterprise apps with complex business logic and testing requirements. Riverpod for leaner projects where simplicity matters. No dogma, just the right tool. -
-| Category | -Tools | -
|---|---|
| {row.category} | -{row.tools} | -
| Component | -What It Does | -
|---|---|
| {row.category} | -{row.tools} | -
| Category | -Tools | -
|---|---|
| {row.category} | -{row.tools} | -
{data.subtitle}
+| Layer | +Tools | +{data.whyHeader} | +
|---|---|---|
| + {row.layer} + | ++ {row.tools} + | ++ {row.why} + | +
{data.bottomNote}
+{data.subtitle}
+| + Layer + | ++ What We Use + | +
|---|---|
| + {row.layer} + | ++ {row.tools} + | +
{data.bottomNote}
+| + {data.col1Header} + | ++ {data.col2Header} + | +
|---|---|
| + {row.col1} + | +{row.col2} | +
+ {data.bottomText} +
++ Deep-dive services for teams with specific .NET challenges. +
+{service.description}
+ + {service.label} + + ++ Domain expertise that accelerates delivery and reduces risk. +
+{industry.description}
+{subtitle}
++ Best for +
+{fw.bestFor}
++ Why +
+{fw.why}
++ {fw.useWhenLabel || "We use it when"} +
+{fw.useWhen}
+{bottomNote}
++ Not always the right call for CPU-intensive processing like video + encoding or ML model training, or for teams deeply invested in Python or + Java with no JavaScript experience. We'll tell you upfront if + something else fits better. +
+ ), + ctaHref: "#book-call", + ctaText: "Book a free architecture call", + ctaSubtext: + "We\u2019ve recommended Python and Go over Node.js when the workload demanded it.", + }, + react: { + sectionId: "decision", + title: "Is React Right for Your", + highlight: "Project?", + subtitle: "The most popular frontend library isn\u2019t always the right one.", + cards: [ + { + label: "Dynamic, interaction-heavy UIs (dashboards, editors, tools)", + description: + "React\u2019s component model and virtual DOM are built for UIs that change constantly. State management is mature, and the ecosystem has a solution for almost any interaction pattern you need.", + }, + { + label: "You need web and mobile from one team", + description: + "React + React Native lets you share business logic, types, and sometimes entire components across web, iOS, and Android. No other ecosystem offers this level of code sharing.", + }, + { + label: "Your team knows JavaScript/TypeScript", + description: + "React has the largest talent pool in frontend. 44.7% of developers use it (Stack Overflow 2025). Hiring is easier, onboarding is faster, and the community support is unmatched.", + }, + { + label: "SPAs where SEO isn\u2019t the primary concern", + description: + "Internal tools, authenticated dashboards, B2B platforms where users log in first. React with Vite gives you fast builds and a simple mental model without SSR complexity.", + }, + ], + bottomNote: ( ++ If SEO and page speed are your top priority,{" "} + + Next.js + {" "} + gives you server-side rendering, static generation, and edge functions + built on React. For structured enterprise apps with strict conventions,{" "} + + Angular + {" "} + provides routing, forms, and dependency injection out of the box. Need a + lightweight backend to pair with React?{" "} + + Node.js + {" "} + or{" "} + + Python + {" "} + depending on your workload. Not sure? That's what our{" "} + + architecture consultation + {" "} + is for. +
+ ), + }, + python: { + sectionId: "decision", + title: "Is Python Right for Your", + highlight: "Backend?", + subtitle: "The right tool for the job. Not the trendy one.", + cards: [ + { + label: "AI/ML features are core to your product", + description: + "Python owns the AI ecosystem. PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn, LangChain - the models, libraries, and talent pool all live here. No other language comes close for ML.", + }, + { + label: "Data-heavy applications (analytics, ETL, reporting)", + description: + "Pandas, NumPy, and Airflow make data manipulation fast. Python handles everything from quick scripts to petabyte-scale processing pipelines.", + }, + { + label: "APIs serving high concurrency (with FastAPI)", + description: + "FastAPI handles 20,000+ requests/second on Uvicorn. Native async, automatic OpenAPI docs, Pydantic validation. Built for the workloads Django wasn\u2019t designed for.", + }, + { + label: "Full-stack web apps with complex business logic", + description: + "Django gives you ORM, auth, admin panel, and security middleware out of the box. Instagram, Spotify, and Dropbox run on it. Proven at scale.", + }, + ], + bottomNote: ( ++ Need raw API throughput without the Python ecosystem?{" "} + + Node.js + {" "} + with NestJS or Fastify handles I/O-bound workloads with a lighter + runtime. Building a frontend-heavy application where the backend is + thin?{" "} + + Next.js + {" "} + API routes might be all you need. CPU-intensive work like video encoding + or real-time game servers? Go or Rust will outperform Python. Not sure? + That's what our{" "} + + architecture consultation + {" "} + is for. +
+ ), + }, + angular: { + sectionId: "decision", + title: "Is Angular Right for Your", + highlight: "Project?", + subtitle: "The right framework for the job. Not the trending one.", + cards: [ + { + label: "Complex enterprise apps with large teams (10+ devs)", + description: + "Angular\u2019s opinionated architecture, dependency injection, and CLI enforce consistency. Everyone follows the same patterns. Less time debating, more time building.", + }, + { + label: "Long-lived applications (5+ year lifespan)", + description: + "Google maintains Angular with 18-month LTS cycles and predictable 6-month releases. TypeScript catches errors at compile time. Codebases stay maintainable at scale.", + }, + { + label: "Data-heavy dashboards and admin panels", + description: + "Built-in forms, validation, HTTP client, and RxJS for real-time data streams. No need to stitch together 8 different libraries.", + }, + { + label: + "Applications requiring strict security and compliance", + description: + "Angular\u2019s built-in XSS protection, CSP support, and structured architecture make security audits straightforward. Banks and government agencies choose Angular for a reason.", + }, + ], + bottomNote: ( ++ Building a content-heavy marketing site?{" "} + + Next.js + {" "} + is likely a better fit. Need a lightweight, flexible UI for a smaller + team? React with Vite gives you more freedom with less structure. + Internal tool with simple CRUD? React or even a low-code solution might + be faster. Not sure? That's what our{" "} + + architecture consultation + {" "} + is for - we've recommended against Angular when it wasn't the + right call. +
+ ), + }, + flutter: { + sectionId: "fit", + title: "When Flutter", + highlight: "Makes Sense", + subtitle: "The right framework for the job, not the trendy one.", + cards: [ + { + label: "Cross-platform mobile apps (iOS + Android)", + description: + "Flutter\u2019s Impeller rendering engine compiles to native ARM code. No JavaScript bridge, no WebView. Your app renders at 60fps with pixel-perfect consistency across platforms.", + }, + { + label: "Multi-platform apps (mobile + web + desktop)", + description: + "One codebase targeting six platforms. Flutter renders everything itself rather than delegating to platform UI components, so your app looks identical everywhere.", + }, + { + label: "Custom UI and animation-heavy experiences", + description: + "Flutter\u2019s own rendering engine (Impeller, built on Vulkan/Metal) means you\u2019re not limited by platform UI components. If you can design it, Flutter can render it at 60fps.", + }, + { + label: "MVP validation on both platforms fast", + description: + "Hot Reload lets developers see changes instantly without restarting the app. Validate on iOS and Android in 8-12 weeks, not 16-24 with two native teams.", + }, + ], + bottomNote: ( ++ Flutter isn't the right call for every project. Apps that need deep + platform-native UI (following iOS HIG or Material Design exactly), or + teams with existing React/JavaScript expertise where React Native would + reuse skills better. We'll tell you upfront if something else fits. +
+ ), + ctaHref: "#book-call", + ctaText: "Book a free architecture call", + }, + "react-native": { + sectionId: "fit", + title: "When React Native", + highlight: "Makes Sense", + subtitle: "The right framework for the job, not the trending one.", + cards: [ + { + label: "Need iOS + Android from one team", + description: + "Single codebase, shared logic, consistent UX. Ship both platforms simultaneously instead of maintaining two separate apps and two separate teams.", + }, + { + label: "Your team already knows React", + description: + "React Native uses the same component model, hooks, and state management. Your web developers can contribute to mobile without learning Swift or Kotlin.", + }, + { + label: "Speed to market matters", + description: + "Expo\u2019s managed workflow, over-the-air updates, and hot reloading mean faster iteration. MVP in 8-12 weeks, not 6 months.", + }, + { + label: "Budget-conscious but quality-focused", + description: + "Cross-platform cuts 30-40% vs. native iOS + native Android. You\u2019re not sacrificing quality - Instagram, Shopify, Discord, and Coinbase all run React Native in production.", + }, + ], + bottomNote: ( ++ If your app is primarily 3D/gaming (Unity or native), needs extreme + low-level hardware access (Bluetooth LE edge cases, heavy AR), or your + team is already deep in Dart, you may want to explore{" "} + + Flutter + {" "} + or go fully native. For SEO-critical marketing sites,{" "} + + Next.js + {" "} + is the better call. For complex backend needs alongside your mobile app, + see our{" "} + + Node.js + {" "} + and{" "} + + Python + {" "} + services. +
+ ), + }, +}; + +export default function TechDecisionTable({ slug }: { slug: string }) { + const data = dataMap[slug]; + if (!data) return null; + + return ( +{data.subtitle}
++ {row.label} +
+{row.description}
++ {data.ctaSubtext} +
+ )} +{card.description}
+