pep420 allows also to declare a single module namespace portion directly in/under the namespace root.
The native part of this example project is missing an example for this type of portion of a native
namespace package.
I will create a pull request to add an example demonstrating the structure of that kind of module portion.
NB: Although #13 is already mentioning/recommending something similar but is also having a sub-folder for the portion package (with an init.py module). But for a single module in the namespace root there is no sub-folder needed.
pep420 allows also to declare a single module namespace portion directly in/under the namespace root.
The native part of this example project is missing an example for this type of portion of a native
namespace package.
I will create a pull request to add an example demonstrating the structure of that kind of module portion.
NB: Although #13 is already mentioning/recommending something similar but is also having a sub-folder for the portion package (with an init.py module). But for a single module in the namespace root there is no sub-folder needed.