You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The **Sp**atial **Int**eraction Modeling (SpInt) module seeks to provide a collection of tools to study spatial interaction processes and analyze spatial interaction data.
11
11
12
-
The [initial development](https://github.com/pysal/pysal/wiki/SpInt-Development) of the module was carried out as a Google Summer of Code
13
-
project (summer 2016). Documentation of the project progress can be found on the
14
-
[project blog](https://tayloroshan.github.io/).
12
+
The [initial development](https://github.com/pysal/pysal/wiki/SpInt-Development) of the module was carried out as a Google Summer of Code project (summer 2016). Documentation of the project progress can be found on the [project blog](https://tayloroshan.github.io/).
15
13
16
14
The module currently supports the calibration of the 'family' of spatial interaction models (Wilson, 1971) which are derived using an entropy maximizing (EM) framework or the equivalent information minimizing (IM) framework. As such, it is able to derive parameters for the following Poisson count models:
17
15
18
-
Models
19
-
------
16
+
## Models
20
17
21
18
- unconstrained gravity model
22
19
- production-constrained model (origin-constrained)
@@ -25,45 +22,32 @@ Models
25
22
26
23
Calibration is carried out using iteratively weighted least squares in a generalized linear modleing framework (Cameron & Trivedi, 2013). These model results have been verified against comparable routines laid out in (Fotheringham and O’Kelly, 1989; Willimans and Fotheringham, 1984) and functions avaialble in R such as GL or Pythons statsmodels. The estimation of the constrained routines are carried out using sparse data strucutres for lower memory overhead and faster computations.
27
24
28
-
Additional Features
29
-
-------------------
25
+
## Additional Features
30
26
31
27
- QuasiPoisson model estimation
32
28
- Regression-based tests for overdispersion
33
-
- Model fit statistics including typical GLM metrics, standardized root mean
34
-
square error, and Sorensen similarit index
35
-
- Vector-based Moran's I statistic for testing for spatial autcorrelation in
36
-
spatial interaction data
37
-
- Local subset model calibration for mappable sets of parameter estimates and model
38
-
diagnostics
39
-
- Three types of spatial interaction spatial weights: origin-destination
40
-
contiguity weights, network-based weights, and vector-based distance weights
29
+
- Model fit statistics including typical GLM metrics, standardized root mean square error, and Sorensen similarit index
30
+
- Vector-based Moran's I statistic for testing for spatial autcorrelation in spatial interaction data
31
+
- Local subset model calibration for mappable sets of parameter estimates and model diagnostics
32
+
- Three types of spatial interaction spatial weights: origin-destination contiguity weights, network-based weights, and vector-based distance weights
41
33
42
-
In Progress
43
-
-----------
34
+
## In Progress
44
35
45
36
- Spatial Autoregressive (Lag) model spatial interaction specification
46
37
47
-
Future Work
48
-
-----------
38
+
## Future Work
49
39
50
40
- Parameter estimation via maximum likelihood and gradient-based optimization
51
41
- Zero-inflated Poisson model
52
42
- Negative Binomial model/zero-inflated negative binomial model
53
43
- Functions to compute competing destinations
54
44
- Functions to compute eigenvector spatial filters
55
45
- Parameter estimation via neural networks
56
-
- Universal (determinsitic) models such as the Radiation model and Inverse
57
-
Population Weighted model
46
+
- Universal (determinsitic) models such as the Radiation model and Inverse Population Weighted model
58
47
59
-
Cameron, C. A. and Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression analyis of count data.
60
-
Cambridge University Press, 1998.
48
+
## Background
61
49
62
-
Fotheringham, A. S. and O'Kelly, M. E. (1989). Spatial Interaction Models: Formulations and Applications. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
63
-
64
-
Williams, P. A. and A. S. Fotheringham (1984), The Calibration of Spatial Interaction
65
-
Models by Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Program SIMODEL, Geographic Monograph
66
-
Series, 7, Department of Geography, Indiana University.
67
-
68
-
Wilson, A. G. (1971). A family of spatial interaction models, and associated developments. Environment and
69
-
Planning A, 3, 1–32.
50
+
***Cameron, C. A. and Trivedi, P. K.** (2014). *Regression analyis of count data*. Cambridge University Press. DOI: [10.1017/CBO9781139013567](https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013567)
51
+
***Fotheringham, A. S. and O'Kelly, M. E.** (1989). *Spatial Interaction Models: Formulations and Applications*. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
52
+
***Williams, P. A. and Fotheringham, A. S.** (1984), *The Calibration of Spatial Interaction Models by Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Program SIMODEL*, Geographic Monograph Series, 7, Department of Geography, Indiana University.
53
+
***Wilson, A. G.** (1971). *A Family of Spatial Interaction Models, and Associated Developments*. Environment and Planning A, 3, 1–32. DOI: [10.1068/a030001](https://doi.org/10.1068/a030001)
0 commit comments