Support for SLURM?

[jrudoler]

Software is great, our lab has had lots of success using it for our imaging pipeline. One additional feature that would be nice is support for SLURM instead of SGE. We've had problems with SGE not properly propagating errors, and not setting memory limits - SLURM has worked better and has more thorough open-source documentation. How feasible would this be?

[pyushkevich]

Hi Joseph, I believe SLURM and LSF are already supported in the latest version - please check on Github. Paul

…

On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:16 PM Joseph Rudoler ***@***.***> wrote: Software is great, our lab has had lots of success using it for our imaging pipeline. One additional feature that would be nice is support for SLURM instead of SGE. We've had problems with SGE not properly propagating errors, and not setting memory limits - SLURM has worked better and has more thorough open-source documentation. How feasible would this be? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJPEW7UZBARRK7XILNJ3XDXJ5CVHANCNFSM6AAAAAAY4SKDPQ> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[jrudoler]

You are totally right! It does support both, and there's detailed instructions in the updated docstrings / help for the training functions. I was reading the online documentation here which doesn't mention anything about it. Thanks!