Skip to content

Make MotionGroup semantics simpler #24

@sansumbrella

Description

@sansumbrella

Working with MotionGroup is not fun. Come up with an alternative. Best-seeming solution is the one from previous iterations of Choreograph: make Timeline a TimelineItem.

Instead of wrapping own timeline, wrap items that are on its parent timeline. Might make it possible to append the grouped animations more simply.

At present, to append a MotionGroup after another one that moves the same output variables, we must use the first group's finishFn to trigger the second group creation. Not a huge deal, but potentially confusing since the groups have their own timelines.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions