improve the sampling workflow

[plastikfan]

Sample mode should not be considered transparent because typically the workflow would be:

• run a smaple
• inspect the result
• perform full run

If transparent, then the originals are noved to the trash location, but this is a problem for a sample run, since the user would have to manually retrieve the original back to source location and re-run. Transparency is only good for a full run.

We need a better workflow.

BEFORE A NON TRANSPARENT RUN, ANY SAMPLE FILES FOUND IN THE SAME DIR AS THE ORIGIN SHOULD BE MOVED TO THE --output LOCATION. THE REASON FOR THIS IS THE USER MAY PERFORM A TRANSPARENT SAMPLE RUN, FOLLOWED BY A NON TRANSPARENT FULL RUN. IN THIS CASE, THE SAMPLE FILES WILL BE IN THE WRONG LOCATION AND SHOULD BE MOVED TO THE --output

[plastikfan]

🍎 plastikfan  …/pixa   feat/improve-the-sampling-workflow     v1.21.6   18:36 
 λ
push-feat
Enumerating objects: 95, done.
Counting objects: 100% (95/95), done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (55/55), done.
Writing objects: 100% (55/55), 8.80 KiB | 530.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 55 (delta 40), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (40/40), completed with 31 local objects.
remote:
remote: Create a pull request for 'feat/improve-the-sampling-workflow' on GitHub by visiting:
remote:      https://github.com/snivilised/pixa/pull/new/feat/improve-the-sampling-workflow
remote:
To https://github.com/snivilised/pixa
 * [new branch]      feat/improve-the-sampling-workflow -> feat/improve-the-sampling-workflow
branch 'feat/improve-the-sampling-workflow' set up to track 'origin/feat/improve-the-sampling-workflow'.
✅ pushed feature to feat/improve-the-sampling-workflow ok!

Did not trigger a build on the branch feat/improve-the-sampling-workflow

[plastikfan]

migrated to go 1.22, which is now causing many lint errors to fire, that didnt so previouly, so these lint errors are bing fixed in this issue.