Show "experimental" badges around ML functionality

[Hellebore]

We want users to have realistic expectations about our ML-powered features, so we're going to add a little UI tag to remind them that we're working to improve the model and it will get better over time.

Summary by Sourcery

Add "experimental" badges and status to ML-powered features to set user expectations about ongoing improvements

New Features:

• Introduce an experimental status for ML-powered features
• Add a beaker icon to visually indicate experimental features

Enhancements:

• Update UI components to support experimental feature status
• Modify toolbar, command bar, and action button components to display experimental badges

Chores:

• Add a global flag IS_ML_EXPERIMENTAL to control experimental feature labeling

[Hellebore]

This is a benchmark review for experiment bakeoff.
Run ID: bakeoff/benchmark_2025-05-02T11-38-04_v1-36-0-dirty.

This pull request was cloned from https://github.com/KittyCAD/modeling-app/pull/6648. (Note: the URL is not a link to avoid triggering a notification on the original pull request.)

Experiment configuration

review_config:
  # User configuration for the review
  # - benchmark - use the user config from the benchmark reviews
  # - <value> - use the value directly
  user_review_config:
    enable_ai_review: true
    enable_rule_comments: false

    enable_complexity_comments: benchmark
    enable_security_comments: benchmark
    enable_tests_comments: benchmark
    enable_comment_suggestions: benchmark

    enable_pull_request_summary: benchmark
    enable_review_guide: benchmark

    enable_approvals: false
    base_branches: [base-sha.*]

  ai_review_config:
    # The model responses to use for the experiment
    # - benchmark - use the model responses from the benchmark reviews
    # - llm - call the language model to generate responses
    model_responses:
      comments_model: benchmark
      comment_validation_model: benchmark
      comment_suggestion_model: benchmark
      complexity_model: benchmark
      security_model: benchmark
      tests_model: benchmark
      pull_request_summary_model: benchmark
      review_guide_model: benchmark
      overall_comments_model: benchmark

# The pull request dataset to run the experiment on
pull_request_dataset:
# CodeRabbit
- https://github.com/neerajkumar161/node-coveralls-integration/pull/5
- https://github.com/gunner95/vertx-rest/pull/1
- https://github.com/Altinn/altinn-access-management-frontend/pull/1427
- https://github.com/theMr17/github-notifier/pull/14
- https://github.com/bearycool11/AI_memory_Loops/pull/142

# Greptile
- https://github.com/gumloop/guMCP/pull/119
- https://github.com/autoblocksai/python-sdk/pull/335
- https://github.com/grepdemos/ImageSharp/pull/6
- https://github.com/grepdemos/server/pull/61
- https://github.com/websentry-ai/pipelines/pull/25

# Graphite
- https://github.com/KittyCAD/modeling-app/pull/6648
- https://github.com/KittyCAD/modeling-app/pull/6628
- https://github.com/Varedis-Org/AI-Test-Repo/pull/2
- https://github.com/deeep-network/bedrock/pull/198
- https://github.com/Metta-AI/metta/pull/277

# Copilot
- https://github.com/hmcts/rpx-xui-webapp/pull/4438
- https://github.com/ganchdev/quez/pull/104
- https://github.com/xbcsmith/ymlfxr/pull/13
- https://github.com/tinapayy/B-1N1T/pull/36
- https://github.com/coder/devcontainer-features/pull/6

# Questions to ask to label the review comments
review_comment_labels: []
# - label: correct
#   question: Is this comment correct?

# Benchmark reviews generated by running
#   python -m scripts.experiment benchmark <experiment_name>
benchmark_reviews: []

[Hellebore]

Reviewer's Guide

This PR introduces an 'experimental' status for features, primarily targeting ML functionality, controlled by a new global constant IS_ML_EXPERIMENTAL. The implementation involves adding the new status to type definitions, updating UI components (Toolbar, CommandComboBox, ActionButtonDropdown, tooltips) to visually indicate this status (usually with a 'beaker' icon), and modifying configuration files to apply this status conditionally to relevant ML features.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Introduced a new 'experimental' status for toolbar items and commands.	Added IS_ML_EXPERIMENTAL constant. Added 'experimental' to ToolbarItem['status'] type. Added 'experimental' to CommandStatus type. Updated createMachineCommand to handle the status property.	src/lib/constants.ts src/lib/toolbar.ts src/lib/commandTypes.ts src/lib/createMachineCommand.ts
Applied the 'experimental' status conditionally to ML-related features.	Updated toolbarConfig for Text-to-CAD items based on IS_ML_EXPERIMENTAL. Updated command configurations ('Prompt-to-edit', 'Text-to-CAD') to set status and modify descriptions.	src/lib/toolbar.ts src/lib/commandBarConfigs/modelingCommandConfig.ts src/lib/commandBarConfigs/applicationCommandConfig.ts
Updated UI components to display an 'Experimental' badge/indicator.	Added a new 'beaker' icon. Modified Toolbar to recognize 'experimental' status for enabling elements. Added badge rendering in Toolbar tooltips. Added an 'Experimental' tooltip to the Text-to-CAD button on the Home page. Added badge rendering in CommandComboBox options. Added icon rendering in ActionButtonDropdown for experimental items.	src/Toolbar.tsx src/Home.tsx src/components/CustomIcon.tsx src/components/CommandComboBox.tsx src/components/ActionButtonDropdown.tsx

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[Hellebore]

Hey @Hellebore - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

• Consider extracting the 'Experimental' badge UI (icon and text) into a reusable component, as it's implemented similarly in multiple places (Toolbar tooltips, Home button tooltip, CommandComboBox, ActionButtonDropdown).
• The logic checking if an item status is 'available' or 'experimental' is repeated in several locations within Toolbar.tsx; consider abstracting this into a helper function or consolidating the check.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

LangSmith trace

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[Hellebore]

issue (typo): Possible typo in flex alignment class.

Tailwind's class is 'items-center', not 'item-center'. Please update it.

Suggested change

	<div className="text-xs flex justify-center item-center gap-1 pb-1 border-b border-chalkboard-50">
	<div className="text-xs flex justify-center items-center gap-1 pb-1 border-b border-chalkboard-50">