MEE editor remarks

[SanderDevisscher]

Based on the remarks of the MEE editor (see below) I see the following steps that need to be adressed:

The main practical concern is the test suite, which is not sufficient for a package with functionality spanning data validation, report generation, spatial processing, taxonomic lookup, density estimation and graphical outputs. There are also several signs that the source archive is unfinished. For example, the package version metadata are inconsistent across files, the archive is not fully anonymised for double-anonymous review (for instance R files contain the author’s name), some documentation still contains placeholder references (‘xxx’), and the dependency metadata require clarification (installAll.R lists packages not reflected in the package DESCRIPTION file).

• write some tests to check validity of the results #3
• remove authors from function #4
• cleanup placeholders in documentation #5
• Move packages to DESCRIPTION #6

Additionally when I look at the R cmd checks I see the following warnings that need to be adressed:

• non-ASCII characters in R/camR_functions.R. #7
• use roxygen2 blocks to document your functions & rebuild the documentation #8