This repository is a Next.js + TypeScript docs site.
app/: App Router pages, layouts, route handlers (page.tsx,layout.tsx,route.ts).components/: Reusable UI and MDX-facing components.content/docs/: Documentation source (.mdx) and section navigation viameta.json.lib/,hooks/,contexts/,providers/,utils/: shared logic and state helpers.scripts/: content generation utilities (OpenAPI markdown andllms.txtgeneration).public/images/: static assets referenced by docs.
Use Bun for all workflows.
bun install --frozen-lockfile: install dependencies consistently.bun run dev: run local docs site onhttp://localhost:3030.bun run build: generate docs artifacts, then run production Next.js build.bun run start: serve the production build.bun run lintorbun run check: run Biome checks across app/content/script directories.bun run lint:fixorbun run check:fix: auto-apply Biome fixes.bun run format: format code/content with Biome.bun run validate-links: run link validation (lint.ts).bun run generate-llms/bun run generate-openapi: regenerate derived documentation files.
- TypeScript is
strict(tsconfig.json); prefer explicit types for public helpers. - Formatting/linting is enforced by Biome (
biome.json):- 2-space indentation, LF endings, 100-char line width
- single quotes in JS/TS, double quotes in JSX
- semicolons and trailing commas enabled
- Follow existing file patterns: Next.js convention files in
app/, kebab-case doc filenames incontent/docs/. - Use the
@/*path alias for internal imports where it improves clarity.
There is no dedicated unit-test framework configured in this repo today. Treat these as required quality gates:
bun run checkbun run validate-linksbun run buildfor changes that affect routing, generation, or site rendering
History follows Conventional Commit style: feat:, fix:, chore:, ci: (example: fix: typo on docs page).
- Keep commit subjects short, imperative, and scoped.
- In PRs, include:
- what changed and why
- impacted paths (for example
content/docs/overview/*) - screenshots/GIFs for UI or layout updates
- linked issue/PR context when applicable
- Start from
.env-example; never commit secrets. - Set
LLMS_BASE_URLwhen generatingllms.txtin non-default environments.
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
These guidelines are working if: fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.