Skip to content

Commit 47bdbf9

Browse files
committed
2 parents 91041b3 + 5793ae5 commit 47bdbf9

File tree

24 files changed

+1787
-13
lines changed

24 files changed

+1787
-13
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 21 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ We are arbitrarily numbering the constants as $C_{1}$, $C_{2}$, etc., mostly bas
2929
| [10b](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/10b.html) | The complex Grothendieck constant | 1.338 | 1.40491 |
3030
| [10c](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/10c.html) | Spencer discrepancy constant (“six standard deviations suffice”) | 1.414214 | 3.674235 (3.65 unpublished) |
3131
| [11a](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/11a.html) | $L^1$ Poincaré constant on the Hamming cube | $\sqrt{\pi/2} \approx 1.2533$ | $\pi/2 - 0.00013 \approx 1.5707$ |
32-
| [11b](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/11b.html) | Critical exponent for isoperimetric inequality on the Hamming cube | 0.5 | 0.50057 |
32+
| [11b](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/11b.html) | Critical exponent for isoperimetric inequality on the Hamming cube | 0.5 | 0.5 |
3333
| [12](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/12a.html) | The Beardwood–Halton–Hammersley constant | 0.6277 | 0.90304 |
3434
| [13a](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/13a.html) | Moser's convex worm cover constant | 0.232239 | 0.2617993878 |
3535
| [13b](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/13b.html) | Lebesgue's convex universal cover constant | 0.832 | 0.8440935944 |
@@ -83,11 +83,30 @@ We are arbitrarily numbering the constants as $C_{1}$, $C_{2}$, etc., mostly bas
8383
| [54](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/54a.html) | Beurling–Ahlfors transform constant | 1 | 1.575 |
8484
| [55](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/55a.html) | Coefficient of the acyclic chromatic index | 1 | 3.142 |
8585
| [56](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/56a.html) | $\mathrm{GL}_2$ Ramanujan conjecture exponent | 0 | $\tfrac{7}{64}=0.109375$ |
86+
| [57a](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/57a.html) | Bloch’s constant | $\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}+2\times 10^{-4}$ | $\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1+\sqrt{3}}}\,\dfrac{\Gamma(1/3)\Gamma(11/12)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\approx 0.4719$ |
87+
| [57b](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/57b.html) | Landau's constant | $\frac{1}{2}+10^{-335}$ | $\dfrac{\Gamma(1/3)\Gamma(5/6)}{\Gamma(1/6)}\approx 0.5433$ |
88+
| [57c](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/57c.html) | Univalent Bloch constant | 0.5708858 | 1 |
89+
| [58](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/58a.html) | Zaremba’s conjecture constant | 5 | $\infty$ |
90+
| [59](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/59a.html) | Bohr radius for the bidisc | 0.3006 | 0.3177 |
91+
| [60](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/60a.html) | Favard-length decay exponent | $\frac{1}{6}$ | 1 |
92+
| [61](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/61a.html) | Selberg congruence spectral-gap constant | 0 | $\frac{7}{64}$ |
93+
| [62a](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/62a.html) | Lindelof (pointwise growth) exponent for the Riemann zeta function | 0 | $\frac{13}{84}$ |
94+
| [62b](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/62b.html) | Burgess-quality subconvexity exponent for Dirichlet $L$-functions | 0 | $\frac{3}{16}$ |
95+
| [63](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/63a.html) | Dirichlet divisor problem exponent | $1/4$ | $\frac{131}{416}$ |
96+
| [64](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/64a.html) | Gauss circle problem exponent | 0 | $\frac{131}{208}$ |
97+
| [65](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/65a.html) | Linnik's constant | 1 | 5 |
98+
| [66](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/66a.html) | Elliott-Halberstam level-of-distribution exponent | $1/2$ | 1 |
99+
| [67](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/67a.html) | Brennan's conjecture exponent | 3.422 | 4 |
100+
| [68](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/68a.html) | Korenblum's constant | 0.28185 | 0.6778994 |
101+
| [69](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/69a.html) | Sendov radius constant | 1 | 2 |
102+
| [70](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/70a.html) | Reverse Brunn-Minkowski constant | 1 | $<\infty$ |
103+
| [71](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/71a.html) | Fourier Entropy-Influence constant | 6.278 | $\infty$ |
104+
| [72](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/72a.html) | Polya-Vinogradov best constant (squarefree asymptotic) | 0 | $\frac{1}{4\pi}\approx 0.07958$ |
86105

87106

88107
## Recent progress
89108

90-
- [11b](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/11b.html) **solved:** $C_{11b} = 0.5$ by P. Durcik, P. Ivanisvili, J. Roos, and X. Xie (paper coming soon).
109+
- [11b](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/11b.html) **solved:** $C_{11b} = 0.5$ by [P. Durcik, P. Ivanisvili, J. Roos, X. Xie](https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20462), 24 Feb 2026.
91110
- [3c](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/3c.html) **improved lower bound:** $C_{3c} \geq 1.67471$ by T. Astor (paper coming soon).
92111
- [51](https://teorth.github.io/optimizationproblems/constants/51a.html) **improved lower bound:** $C_{51} \geq 0.58507$ by [Y. He and Q. Tang](https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12217), 12 Feb 2026.
93112

constants/11b.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $$
2727
| $\log_2(3/2)\approx 0.58496$ | [KP2020] | In particular implies $\mathbb{E}h_{A}^\beta \ge 1/2$ for all half-size $A$ |
2828
| $0.53$ | [BIM2023] | Sharp inequality of the form $\mathbb{E}h_{A}^{0.53}\ge 2\mu(A)(1-\mu(A))$ for $\mu(A)\ge 1/2$; gives the half-size case |
2929
| $0.50057$ | [DIR2024] | Current best published; Theorem 1.1 implies the half-size case |
30-
| $0.5$ | [DIRX2026] | |
30+
| $0.5$ | [DIRX2026] | Solves the problem by establishing $\beta=0.5$. |
3131

3232
## Known lower bounds
3333

@@ -59,6 +59,6 @@ where $|\nabla(A,B)|$ denotes the *normalized* number of edges with one endpoint
5959

6060
- [BIM2023] Beltran, D.; Ivanisvili, P.; Madrid, J. *On sharp isoperimetric inequalities on the hypercube.* [arXiv:2303.06738](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06738) (2023).
6161
- [DIR2024] Durcik, P.; Ivanisvili, P.; Roos, J. *Sharp isoperimetric inequalities on the Hamming cube near the critical exponent.* [arXiv:2407.12674](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12674) (2024).
62-
- [DIRX2026] Durcik, P.; Ivanisvili, P.; Roos, J; Xie, X. *TBA* TBA (2026)
62+
- [DIRX2026] Durcik, P.; Ivanisvili, P.; Roos, J; Xie, X. *Sharp isoperimetric inequalities on the Hamming cube II: The critical exponent* [arXiv:2602.20462](https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20462) (2026)
6363
- [Har1966] Harper, L. *Optimal numberings and isoperimetric problems on graphs.* J. Comb. Theory **1** (1966), no. 3, 385–393.
6464
- [KP2020] Kahn, J.; Park, J. *An isoperimetric inequality for the Hamming cube and some consequences.* Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. **148** (2020), 4213–4224. [arXiv:1909.04274](https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.04274)

constants/33a.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -94,10 +94,10 @@ $$
9494
- <a id="DM2013"></a>**[DM2013]** Duursma, Iwan; Mak, Koon-Ho. *On lower bounds for the Ihara constants $A(2)$ and $A(3)$.* Compositio Mathematica **149** (2013), 1108–1128. DOI: [10.1112/S0010437X12000796](https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X12000796). [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=On+lower+bounds+for+the+Ihara+constants+A%282%29+and+A%283%29+Duursma+Mak). [arXiv PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1102.4127.pdf)
9595
- <a id="DM2013-weil-bound"></a>**[DM2013-weil-bound]**
9696
**loc:** arXiv v4 PDF p.1, Section 1 (Introduction).
97-
**quote:** “It is well-known that the Weil bound $\\#X(\mathbb{F}_q) \le q + 1 + 2g\sqrt{q}$ is not sharp if $g$ is large compared to $q$.”
97+
**quote:** “It is well-known that the Weil bound $\#X(\mathbb{F}_q) \le q + 1 + 2g\sqrt{q}$ is not sharp if $g$ is large compared to $q$.”
9898
- <a id="DM2013-def-Nqg"></a>**[DM2013-def-Nqg]**
9999
**loc:** arXiv v4 PDF p.1, Section 1 (Introduction).
100-
**quote:** “Put $N_q(g) := \max \\#X(\mathbb{F}_q)$, where the maximum is taken over all curves $X/\mathbb{F}_q$ with genus $g$.”
100+
**quote:** “Put $N_q(g) := \max \#X(\mathbb{F}_q)$, where the maximum is taken over all curves $X/\mathbb{F}_q$ with genus $g$.”
101101
- <a id="DM2013-def-Aq"></a>**[DM2013-def-Aq]**
102102
**loc:** arXiv v4 PDF p.1, Section 1 (Introduction).
103103
**quote:** “The Ihara constant is defined by $A(q) := \limsup_{g\to\infty} N_q(g)/g$.”

constants/52a.md

Lines changed: 5 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ $\liminf_{n \to \infty} r_{3,n}$.
3131
| 5.081 | [MV1995] ||
3232
| 4.758 | [KMPS1995] ||
3333
| 4.643 | [DB1997] ||
34+
| 4.602 | [KKKS1998] ||
3435
| 4.506 | [DBM2000] ||
3536
| 4.596 | [JSV2000] ||
3637
| 4.571 | [KKSVZ2007]||
@@ -76,7 +77,9 @@ solving the satisfiability problem, *Discrete Appl. Math.* 5, 77-87, 1983.
7677
satisfiability threshold conjecture, *Random Structures & Algorithms* 7(1), 59-80, 1995.
7778

7879
- [DB1997] O. Dubois, Y. Boufkhad, A general upper bound for the satisfiability threshold of random $r$-SAT formulae, *Journal of Algorithms* 24(2), 395-420, 1997.
79-
80+
81+
- [KKKS1998] L.M. Kirousis, E. Kranakis, D. Krizanc, and Y.C. Stamatiou, Approximating the unsatisfiability threshold of random formulas, *Random Structures & Algorithms* 12(3), 253-69, 1998.
82+
8083
- [DBM2000] O. Dubois, Y Boufkhad, and J. Mandler, Typical random 3-SAT formulae and the satisfiability threshold, *Proceedings of the 11th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2000*. Also in arXiv preprint: cs/0211036, 2002.
8184

8285
- [JSV2000] S. Janson, Y.C. Stamatiou, M. Vamvakari, Bounding the unsatisfiability threshold of random 3-SAT, *Random Structures & Algorithms* 17(2), 103-116, 2000.
@@ -99,7 +102,7 @@ satisfiability threshold conjecture, *Random Structures & Algorithms* 7(1), 59-
99102

100103
- [AC2000] D. Achioptas, and G.B. Sorkin, Optimal myopic algorithms for random 3-SAT, *Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science*, IEEE Computer Society, 590-600, 2000.
101104

102-
- [KKL2000] A.C. Kaporis, L.M. Kirousis, and E.G. Lalas, The probabilistic analysis of a greedy satisfiability algorithm, *Algorithms - ESA*, 574-586, 2002.
105+
- [KKL2002] A.C. Kaporis, L.M. Kirousis, and E.G. Lalas, The probabilistic analysis of a greedy satisfiability algorithm, *Algorithms - ESA*, 574-586, 2002.
103106

104107
- [HS2003] M. Hajiaghayi, and G.B. Sorkin, The satisfiability threshold of random 3-SAT is at least 3.52, arXiv preprint math/0310193, 2003.
105108

constants/53a.md

Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ $$
1616
We define
1717

1818
$$
19-
C_{53a}\ :=\ \sup_{n\ge 2}\ \frac{D(C_n^3)-1}{n-1},
19+
C_{53}\ :=\ \sup_{n\ge 2}\ \frac{D(C_n^3)-1}{n-1},
2020
$$
2121

2222
the maximal normalized Davenport constant among the rank-$3$ groups $C_n^3$.
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Here, the $3^{\omega(n)}$ term is inherited from earlier published work, while t
3737
In particular,
3838

3939
$$
40-
3\ \le\ C_{53a}\ \le\ 20369.
40+
3\ \le\ C_{53}\ \le\ 20369.
4141
$$
4242

4343
<a href="#Zak2019-cor3.11">[Zak2019-cor3.11]</a>
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ $$
4848
D(C_n^3)\ =\ 3(n-1)+1,
4949
$$
5050

51-
equivalently $C_{53a}=3$.
51+
equivalently $C_{53}=3$.
5252
<a href="#GG2006-conj3.5">[GG2006-conj3.5]</a> <a href="#GG2006-D-equals-1-plus-d">[GG2006-D-equals-1-plus-d]</a> <a href="#GG2006-def-dstar">[GG2006-def-dstar]</a>
5353

5454
One unconditional family of exact evaluations is given by prime powers: if $n$ is a prime power, then $C_n^3$ is a $p$-group, and Theorem 3.1 implies $d(C_n^3)=d^*(C_n^3)=3(n-1)$ and hence $D(C_n^3)=3(n-1)+1$.
@@ -64,13 +64,13 @@ Published work before the 2019 preprint includes Gao (2000) on rank-$3$ groups a
6464

6565
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
6666
| ----- | --------- | -------- |
67-
| $20369$ | <a href="#Zak2019">[Zak2019]</a> | From Corollary 3.11: $D(C_n^3)\le 20369(n-1)+1$ for all $n\ge 2$, hence $C_{53a}\le 20369$. <a href="#Zak2019-cor3.11">[Zak2019-cor3.11]</a> |
67+
| $20369$ | <a href="#Zak2019">[Zak2019]</a> | From Corollary 3.11: $D(C_n^3)\le 20369(n-1)+1$ for all $n\ge 2$, hence $C_{53}\le 20369$. <a href="#Zak2019-cor3.11">[Zak2019-cor3.11]</a> |
6868

6969
## Known lower bounds
7070

7171
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
7272
| ----- | --------- | -------- |
73-
| $3$ | <a href="#GG2006">[GG2006]</a> | Using $d(C_n^3)\ge d^*(C_n^3)=3(n-1)$ and $D(G)=1+d(G)$ gives $D(C_n^3)\ge 3(n-1)+1$, hence $C_{53a}\ge 3$. <a href="#GG2006-d-ge-dstar">[GG2006-d-ge-dstar]</a> <a href="#GG2006-D-equals-1-plus-d">[GG2006-D-equals-1-plus-d]</a> <a href="#GG2006-def-dstar">[GG2006-def-dstar]</a> |
73+
| $3$ | <a href="#GG2006">[GG2006]</a> | Using $d(C_n^3)\ge d^*(C_n^3)=3(n-1)$ and $D(G)=1+d(G)$ gives $D(C_n^3)\ge 3(n-1)+1$, hence $C_{53}\ge 3$. <a href="#GG2006-d-ge-dstar">[GG2006-d-ge-dstar]</a> <a href="#GG2006-D-equals-1-plus-d">[GG2006-D-equals-1-plus-d]</a> <a href="#GG2006-def-dstar">[GG2006-def-dstar]</a> |
7474

7575
## Additional comments and links
7676

constants/57a.md

Lines changed: 83 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
1+
# Bloch’s constant
2+
3+
## Description of constant
4+
5+
Let $\mathbb{D}=\{z\in\mathbb{C}:\lvert z\rvert<1\}$. Following standard notation, let $\mathcal{F}$ be the class of holomorphic functions $f:\mathbb{D}\to\mathbb{C}$ normalized by $\lvert f'(0)\rvert=1$ (equivalently, after rotation, $f'(0)=1$). <a href="#BS2023-def-F">[BS2023-def-F]</a>
6+
7+
For $f\in\mathcal{F}$, let $B_f$ denote the radius of the largest **univalent disk** contained in $f(\mathbb{D})$ (i.e., a disk $\Delta\subset f(\mathbb{D})$ such that some domain $\Omega\subset\mathbb{D}$ is mapped univalently by $f$ onto $\Delta$). <a href="#BS2023-def-Bf">[BS2023-def-Bf]</a> <a href="#BS2023-def-univalent-disk">[BS2023-def-univalent-disk]</a>
8+
9+
The **Bloch constant** is then defined by the extremal value
10+
$$
11+
B_{\mathrm{Bloch}}\ :=\ \inf_{f\in\mathcal{F}} B_f.
12+
$$
13+
<a href="#BS2023-def-B">[BS2023-def-B]</a>
14+
15+
We define
16+
$$
17+
C_{57a}\ :=\ B_{\mathrm{Bloch}}.
18+
$$
19+
20+
The exact value of $B_{\mathrm{Bloch}}$ is not proved; the best recorded bounds in the literature cited below are
21+
$$
22+
\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}+2\times 10^{-4}\ <\ B_{\mathrm{Bloch}}\ \le\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\sqrt{3}}}\,\frac{\Gamma(1/3)\Gamma(11/12)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\ \approx\ 0.4719.
23+
$$
24+
<a href="#BS2023-bounds-B">[BS2023-bounds-B]</a>
25+
26+
Moreover, the upper bound is due to Ahlfors–Grunsky (1937) and was conjectured by them to be sharp. <a href="#BS2023-AG-conj-B">[BS2023-AG-conj-B]</a>
27+
28+
## Known upper bounds
29+
30+
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
31+
| ----- | --------- | -------- |
32+
| $\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1+\sqrt{3}}}\,\dfrac{\Gamma(1/3)\Gamma(11/12)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\approx 0.4719$ | <a href="#AG1937">[AG1937]</a> | Ahlfors–Grunsky bound; conjectured sharp. <a href="#BS2023-AG-conj-B">[BS2023-AG-conj-B]</a> <a href="#BS2023-bounds-B">[BS2023-bounds-B]</a> |
33+
34+
## Known lower bounds
35+
36+
| Bound | Reference | Comments |
37+
| ----- | --------- | -------- |
38+
| $\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{4}+2\times 10^{-4}$ | <a href="#CG1996">[CG1996]</a> | Best recorded lower bound (as quoted in the survey literature). <a href="#BS2023-bounds-B">[BS2023-bounds-B]</a> |
39+
40+
## Additional comments and links
41+
42+
- **Conjectural value.** It is conjectured that $B_{\mathrm{Bloch}}$ equals the Ahlfors–Grunsky upper bound listed above. <a href="#BS2023-AG-conj-B">[BS2023-AG-conj-B]</a>
43+
44+
- **Relation to Landau-type constants.** If $L_{\mathrm{Landau}}$ is Landau’s constant (entry 57b) and $B_u$ is the univalent Bloch constant (entry 57c), then
45+
$$
46+
B_{\mathrm{Bloch}}\ \le\ L_{\mathrm{Landau}}\ \le\ B_u.
47+
$$
48+
<a href="#BS2023-relations">[BS2023-relations]</a>
49+
50+
- [Wikipedia page on Bloch’s theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloch%27s_theorem)
51+
52+
## References
53+
54+
- <a id="BS2023"></a>**[BS2023]** Bhowmik, Bappaditya; Sen, Sambhunath. *Improved Bloch and Landau constants for meromorphic functions.* Canadian Mathematical Bulletin **66** (2023), 1269–1273. DOI: [10.4153/S0008439523000346](https://doi.org/10.4153/S0008439523000346). PDF: https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/FD465D1F2CEF7E8C62AFF16C3E89B7B4/S0008439523000346a.pdf/improved_bloch_and_landau_constants_for_meromorphic_functions.pdf. [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Improved+Bloch+and+Landau+constants+for+meromorphic+functions+Bhowmik+Sen+2023)
55+
- <a id="BS2023-def-F"></a>**[BS2023-def-F]**
56+
**loc:** Cambridge PDF p.1, §1 “Introduction”
57+
**quote:** “let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of all holomorphic functions from $\mathbb{D}$ to the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$ with $f'(0)=1$.”
58+
- <a id="BS2023-def-Bf"></a>**[BS2023-def-Bf]**
59+
**loc:** Cambridge PDF p.1, §1 “Introduction”
60+
**quote:** “Given a function $f\in\mathcal{F}$, let $B_f$ be the radius of the largest univalent disk in $f(\mathbb{D})$,”
61+
- <a id="BS2023-def-univalent-disk"></a>**[BS2023-def-univalent-disk]**
62+
**loc:** Cambridge PDF p.1, §1 “Introduction”
63+
**quote:** “by a univalent disk $\Delta$ in $f(\mathbb{D})$, we mean that there exists a domain $\Omega$ in $\mathbb{D}$ such that $f$ maps $\Omega$ univalently onto $\Delta$.”
64+
- <a id="BS2023-def-B"></a>**[BS2023-def-B]**
65+
**loc:** Cambridge PDF p.1, §1 “Introduction”
66+
**quote:** “$B:=\inf\{B_f:f\in\mathcal{F}\}$.”
67+
- <a id="BS2023-bounds-B"></a>**[BS2023-bounds-B]**
68+
**loc:** Cambridge PDF p.1, §1 “Introduction”
69+
**quote:** “the best known upper and lower bounds for $B$ are $\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}+2\times10^{-4}<B\le \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\sqrt{3}}}\frac{\Gamma(1/3)\Gamma(11/12)}{\Gamma(1/4)}\approx 0.4719$.”
70+
- <a id="BS2023-AG-conj-B"></a>**[BS2023-AG-conj-B]**
71+
**loc:** Cambridge PDF p.1, §1 “Introduction”
72+
**quote:** “The upper bound for the Bloch constant $B$ was obtained by Ahlfors and Grunsky; also, they conjectured that this upper bound is the precise value.”
73+
- <a id="BS2023-relations"></a>**[BS2023-relations]**
74+
**loc:** Cambridge PDF p.2, §1 “Introduction”
75+
**quote:** “The relation between Bloch constant, Landau constant, locally univalent Bloch constant, and univalent Bloch constant is $B\le B_l\le L\le B_u$.”
76+
77+
- <a id="AG1937"></a>**[AG1937]** Ahlfors, Lars V.; Grunsky, Helmut. *Über die Blochsche Konstante.* Mathematische Zeitschrift **42** (1937), 671–673. DOI: [10.1007/BF01160101](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01160101). [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ahlfors+Grunsky+%C3%9Cber+die+Blochsche+Konstante+Math.+Z.+42+1937+671-673)
78+
79+
- <a id="CG1996"></a>**[CG1996]** Chen, Huaihui; Gauthier, Paul M. *On Bloch’s constant.* Journal d’Analyse Mathématique **69** (1996), 275–291. DOI: [10.1007/BF02787110](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02787110). [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Chen+Gauthier+On+Bloch%27s+constant+J.+Analyse+Math.+69+1996+275-291)
80+
81+
## Contribution notes
82+
83+
Prepared with assistance from ChatGPT 5.2 Pro.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)