|
| 1 | +# Dual matrix multiplication exponent |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Description of constant |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +In algebraic complexity theory, for each real $k \ge 0$, let $\omega(k)$ denote the exponent for multiplying an $n \times n^k$ matrix by an $n^k \times n$ matrix. We define |
| 6 | +$$ |
| 7 | +\alpha := \sup\{k \ge 0 : \omega(k) = 2\}. |
| 8 | +$$ |
| 9 | +Thus $\alpha$ is the largest aspect-ratio exponent for which rectangular matrix multiplication can still be performed in essentially quadratic arithmetic time. |
| 10 | +<a href="#LGU2018-def-omega">[LGU2018-def-omega]</a> <a href="#LGU2018-def-alpha">[LGU2018-def-alpha]</a> |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +We define |
| 13 | +$$ |
| 14 | +C_{15b} := \alpha. |
| 15 | +$$ |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +The current best established range is |
| 18 | +$$ |
| 19 | +0.321334 < C_{15b} \le 1. |
| 20 | +$$ |
| 21 | +<a href="#WXXZ2024-alpha-0321334">[WXXZ2024-alpha-0321334]</a> <a href="#CLLZ2025-ub-1">[CLLZ2025-ub-1]</a> |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +## Known upper bounds |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +| Bound | Reference | Comments | |
| 26 | +| ----- | --------- | -------- | |
| 27 | +| $1$ | [[CLLZ2025](#CLLZ2025)] | Current best general upper bound. <a href="#CLLZ2025-ub-1">[CLLZ2025-ub-1]</a> | |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +## Known lower bounds |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +| Bound | Reference | Comments | |
| 32 | +| ----- | --------- | -------- | |
| 33 | +| $0$ | | Trivial: $\omega(0)=2$ since multiplying an $n\times 1$ matrix by a $1\times n$ matrix is an outer product. | |
| 34 | +| $0.172$ | [[LGU2018](#LGU2018)] | Coppersmith’s 1982 theorem yields $\omega(0.172)=2$. <a href="#LGU2018-alpha-0172">[LGU2018-alpha-0172]</a> | |
| 35 | +| $0.29462$ | [[LG2012](#LG2012)] | Previous record due to Coppersmith (1997), as recorded in Le Gall’s 2012 paper. <a href="#LG2012-alpha-029462-030298">[LG2012-alpha-029462-030298]</a> | |
| 36 | +| $0.30298$ | [[LG2012](#LG2012)] | Le Gall’s 2012 improvement. <a href="#LG2012-alpha-029462-030298">[LG2012-alpha-029462-030298]</a> | |
| 37 | +| $0.31389$ | [[LGU2018](#LGU2018)] | Improvement from the fourth-power Coppersmith–Winograd analysis. <a href="#LGU2018-alpha-031389">[LGU2018-alpha-031389]</a> | |
| 38 | +| $0.321334$ | [[WXXZ2024](#WXXZ2024)] | Current best published lower bound. <a href="#WXXZ2024-alpha-0321334">[WXXZ2024-alpha-0321334]</a> | |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +## Additional comments and links |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +- **Algorithmic relevance.** Better bounds for rectangular matrix multiplication improve algorithms for all-pairs shortest paths and sparse matrix multiplication. |
| 43 | + <a href="#LG2012-applications">[LG2012-applications]</a> |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +- [Wikipedia page on computational complexity of matrix multiplication](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_complexity_of_matrix_multiplication) |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +## References |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +- <a id="CLLZ2025"></a>**[CLLZ2025]** Christandl, Matthias; Le Gall, François; Lysikov, Vladimir; Zuiddam, Jeroen. *Barriers for rectangular matrix multiplication.* Computational Complexity **34** (2025), article 4. DOI: [10.1007/s00037-025-00264-9](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-025-00264-9). Preprint: [arXiv:2003.03019 PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03019.pdf). [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Matthias+Christandl+Francois+Le+Gall+Vladimir+Lysikov+Jeroen+Zuiddam+Barriers+for+rectangular+matrix+multiplication) |
| 50 | + - <a id="CLLZ2025-ub-1"></a>**[CLLZ2025-ub-1]** |
| 51 | + **loc:** arXiv PDF p.4, Figure 2 caption |
| 52 | + **quote:** “The red points are the best upper bounds on $\alpha$, namely $1$.” |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +- <a id="LG2012"></a>**[LG2012]** Le Gall, François. *Faster Algorithms for Rectangular Matrix Multiplication.* In: *2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2012)*, 514–523. DOI: [10.1109/FOCS.2012.80](https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2012.80). Preprint: [arXiv:1204.1111 PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.1111.pdf). [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Francois+Le+Gall+Faster+Algorithms+for+Rectangular+Matrix+Multiplication+FOCS+2012) |
| 55 | + - <a id="LG2012-alpha-029462-030298"></a>**[LG2012-alpha-029462-030298]** |
| 56 | + **loc:** arXiv PDF p.1, Abstract |
| 57 | + **quote:** “In this paper we show that $\alpha>0.30298$, which improves the previous record $\alpha>0.29462$ by Coppersmith (Journal of Complexity, 1997).” |
| 58 | + - <a id="LG2012-applications"></a>**[LG2012-applications]** |
| 59 | + **loc:** arXiv PDF p.1, Abstract |
| 60 | + **quote:** “For example, we directly obtain a $O(n^{2.5302})$-time algorithm for the all-pairs shortest paths problem over directed graphs with small integer weights, improving over the $O(n^{2.575})$-time algorithm by Zwick (JACM 2002), and also improve the time complexity of sparse square matrix multiplication.” |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +- <a id="LGU2018"></a>**[LGU2018]** Le Gall, François; Urrutia, Florent. *Improved Rectangular Matrix Multiplication using Powers of the Coppersmith-Winograd Tensor.* In: *Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2018)*, 1029–1046. DOI: [10.1137/1.9781611975031.67](https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975031.67). Preprint: [arXiv:1708.05622 PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.05622.pdf). [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Francois+Le+Gall+Florent+Urrutia+Improved+Rectangular+Matrix+Multiplication+using+Powers+of+the+Coppersmith-Winograd+Tensor) |
| 63 | + - <a id="LGU2018-def-omega"></a>**[LGU2018-def-omega]** |
| 64 | + **loc:** arXiv PDF p.3, §1.1 “Background” |
| 65 | + **quote:** “In analogy to the square case, the exponent of rectangular matrix multiplication, denoted $\omega(k)$, is defined as the minimum value such that this product can be computed using $O(n^{\omega(k)+\epsilon})$ arithmetic operations for any constant $\epsilon>0$.” |
| 66 | + - <a id="LGU2018-def-alpha"></a>**[LGU2018-def-alpha]** |
| 67 | + **loc:** arXiv PDF p.3, §1.1 “Background” |
| 68 | + **quote:** “$\alpha = \sup\{k \mid \omega(k)=2\}$.” |
| 69 | + - <a id="LGU2018-alpha-0172"></a>**[LGU2018-alpha-0172]** |
| 70 | + **loc:** arXiv PDF p.3, §1.1 “Background” |
| 71 | + **quote:** “Coppersmith [8] showed in 1982 that $\omega(0.172)=2$.” |
| 72 | + - <a id="LGU2018-alpha-031389"></a>**[LGU2018-alpha-031389]** |
| 73 | + **loc:** arXiv PDF p.4, §1.2 “Our results” |
| 74 | + **quote:** “$\alpha \ge 0.31389$” |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +- <a id="WXXZ2024"></a>**[WXXZ2024]** Vassilevska Williams, Virginia; Xu, Yinzhan; Xu, Zixuan; Zhou, Renfei. *New Bounds for Matrix Multiplication: from Alpha to Omega.* In: *Proceedings of the 2024 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2024)*, 3792–3835. DOI: [10.1137/1.9781611977912.134](https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977912.134). Preprint: [arXiv:2307.07970 PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.07970.pdf). [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Virginia+Vassilevska+Williams+Yinzhan+Xu+Zixuan+Xu+Renfei+Zhou+New+Bounds+for+Matrix+Multiplication+from+Alpha+to+Omega) |
| 77 | + - <a id="WXXZ2024-alpha-0321334"></a>**[WXXZ2024-alpha-0321334]** |
| 78 | + **loc:** arXiv PDF p.3, Introduction, paragraph beginning “In particular” |
| 79 | + **quote:** “In particular, we show that $\alpha >0.321334$ (improving upon the previous bound $0.31389$)” |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +## Contribution notes |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +Prepared with assistance from ChatGPT 5.2 Pro. |
0 commit comments