Comments are definitely important.
I see two main ways of doing this:
1 - Have an all-encompassing comment type, that can reference any other type of entry either by IDRef, or association by similar enough datetime
2 - Include a comment/description field as a standard for all the types of entries or only certain ones.
I kind of think #1 makes sense from a data modelling point of view, but it may be more difficult to maintain, and I'm not sure if we want to worry about IDs (other than patient/timestamp).. part of the flexibility of JSON etc is not having to worry about incrementing/creating an ID.
Comments are definitely important.
I see two main ways of doing this:
1 - Have an all-encompassing comment type, that can reference any other type of entry either by IDRef, or association by similar enough datetime
2 - Include a comment/description field as a standard for all the types of entries or only certain ones.
I kind of think #1 makes sense from a data modelling point of view, but it may be more difficult to maintain, and I'm not sure if we want to worry about IDs (other than patient/timestamp).. part of the flexibility of JSON etc is not having to worry about incrementing/creating an ID.