Hi @thevpc,
I've been exploring the nuts codebase and noticed a few code quality improvements that could make the code more readable and maintainable
without changing any existing behavior.
In particular, I saw a couple places in nuts-runtime where things like duplicated snippets, slightly complex conditionals, and some unclear variable names could be cleaned up with small refactoring steps.
The kinds of changes I’m thinking about are things like:
- extracting duplicated logic into small private helper methods
- introducing a few explaining variables to make conditionals easier to follow
- minor renaming of variables where the intent isn’t immediately clear
These are purely structural improvements, no logic changes, no API, changes, all existing tests will continue to pass.
Before I start working on it, I just wanted to check whether you’re open to small refactoring PR like this. I want to make sure this aligns with your contribution goals before starting the implementation.
Thanks for maintaining such an interesting project.
Hi @thevpc,
I've been exploring the nuts codebase and noticed a few code quality improvements that could make the code more readable and maintainable
without changing any existing behavior.
In particular, I saw a couple places in nuts-runtime where things like duplicated snippets, slightly complex conditionals, and some unclear variable names could be cleaned up with small refactoring steps.
The kinds of changes I’m thinking about are things like:
These are purely structural improvements, no logic changes, no API, changes, all existing tests will continue to pass.
Before I start working on it, I just wanted to check whether you’re open to small refactoring PR like this. I want to make sure this aligns with your contribution goals before starting the implementation.
Thanks for maintaining such an interesting project.