Skip to content

Sphinx-Needs ontology PR and discussion #21

@ubmarco

Description

@ubmarco

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The proposal from the user group meetings needs to find its way into Sphinx-Needs.
This requires a PR for the preliminary work and a discussion about missing usecases or alternative approaches.

Existing discussion:
useblocks/sphinx-needs#601

Describe the solution you'd like
New discussion thread and a PR

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request
No fields configured for Feature.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions