Replies: 5 comments
-
|
Would this make sense to fall into a more broad handshake type thing @oskarth? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
See https://forum.vac.dev/t/transport-agnostic-waku/28/3 for some ideas here |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
yeah @oskarth, I believe this becomes relevant for compatibility. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
cc @jm-clius for awareness |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Generic message follows I'm going to go ahead and close this discussion as:
If you feel like this is in error, please create a thread on Vac forum or a new issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Problem
A client might only have certain transports available. To sync messages, the clients need to know how to reach each other over which transports.
Acceptance criteria
A spec and proof of concept for a data sync client that allows:
Notes
See https://code.briarproject.org/briar/briar/wikis/Transport-Properties-Client
Also see protocol negotiation in libp2p.
Example: Whisper / MANET / USB sync
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions