From de5f0d0a33b4e131e8efa785055519b7e4ce8315 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arkadiy Miteiko Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 22:17:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] CAT-ALIGN-001: position runtime admissibility within the field Add the standard category role block and state the boundary the formal model already implies: RA(x,t) takes the current authority envelope A_t as an input. It evaluates whether valid authority exists at the moment of reliance; it does not establish that authority, interpret the governing source that constitutes it, or perform institutional admission. The static-authorization versus runtime-admissibility distinction is preserved exactly as a distinction within Open Institutional Computation, not a claim about the field. Documentation only, additive. No research equation, predicate, scenario, experiment result, paper text or reproducibility record was changed. Signed-off-by: Arkadiy Miteiko Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Pkw68qW3iRaeJsiMPBEPvW --- README.md | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index ed4868e..fbc8025 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -14,6 +14,20 @@ The primary demonstrated failure mode is **Dynamic Classification Failure (DCF)* --- +## Role in Open Institutional Computation + +**Category:** Open Institutional Computation +**This component:** Research into the runtime currentness/admissibility boundary — the point at which a prior permissibility classification stops being sufficient for institutional reliance +**Upstream:** An authority envelope, evidentiary basis and institutional state established outside this repository through authorized institutional interpretation and admission; the Veraxis reference path for that upstream problem is [OIC — Open Institutional Compiler](https://github.com/veraxis-protocol/Institutional-Compiler) +**Downstream:** A formal criterion by which runtime and enforcement systems may be evaluated for defective reliance +**Canonical category thesis:** https://github.com/veraxis-protocol/institutional-continuity/blob/main/THESIS.md + +The distinction this repository formalizes — static authorization versus runtime admissibility — is a distinction *within* the field, not a claim about it. `RA(x,t)` takes the current authority envelope `A_t` as an input. It evaluates whether valid authority exists at the moment of reliance; it does not establish that authority, interpret the governing source that constitutes it, or perform institutional admission. + +Architectural role does not imply production readiness; this is a research repository accompanying a paper, and its scenarios, predicates and results define the exact demonstrated scope. + +--- + ## Core formal claim Institutional reliance on a machine-generated action requires runtime admissibility at the moment of reliance: