Test request - community_metadata_includes_subject_scheme_panet

[rduyme]

Metric

https://fairsharing.org/6465/

This metric ensures that the research object provided by the supplied URL is associated with a DataCite DOI whose metadata contains a subject term in PaNET scheme. This means that the DataCite metadata for the research object's DOI must define a subject using PaNET schemeUri or subjectScheme.

Test

• input
  • DOI
• output :
  • "Indeterminate" . if the DOI is not hosted by DataCite registration agency
  • "success": if the Datacite DOI metadata contains a subject in PaNET scheme
  • "fail" : if the Datacite DOI metadata contains a subject in PaNET scheme

Examples :
* 10.5442/ND000001 : Success
* 10.15151/ESRF-ES-2120018741 : Success
* 10.5281/zenodo.15388270 : Fails
* 10.1039/D5NR02241J : Indeterminate not in DataCite

How to implement :

• Check subjects[].schemeUri contains "PaNET" string or subjects[].subjectScheme contains "PaNET" string in DataCite API.

 https://api.datacite.org/dois/10.5442/ND000001 (HZB facility)
 "subjects": [
        {
          "subject": "neutron diffraction",
          "valueUri": "http://purl.org/pan-science/PaNET/PaNET01217",
          "schemeUri": "http://purl.org/pan-science/PaNET/",
          "subjectScheme": "The Photon and Neutron Experimental Techniques Ontology" 
        }
      ],


https://api.datacite.org/dois/10.15151/ESRF-ES-2120018741  (ESRF facility)
  {
          "subject": "x-ray probe",
          "valueUri": "http://purl.org/pan-science/PaNET/PaNET01012",
          "schemeUri": "http://purl.org/pan-science/PaNET/PaNET.owl", 
          "subjectScheme": "PaNET",
          "classificationCode": "PaNET01012"
        }

Note

• It is specific to PaNOSC community using this PaNET terminology. You have similar community tests in F-UJI (see F-UJI example in comment Test request - DataCite record is related to a ontology vocabulary term (ex: PaNET) #2 (comment))
• If we can't pass parameters to the test other than the DOI, the "PaNET" is hardcoded

[rduyme]

@markwilkinson let me know if this is too community / not generic enough to be implemented and maintained in Champion.