Add an option for the non-legal audiance

[idanYouval]

Hi @willchen96

I love the project, it's awesome! I myself wrote something similar but targeting a different audience. I created caseodds.ai together with my wife. and our objective was to make legal knowledge more accessible to non-lawyers for free. that's why caseodds breaks legal disputes into key findings, strength and weaknesses and recommendation.

I would kindly like to suggest, giving our your altruistic objective, that you will add on your website a reference to our service for those who find you, but don't have the legal brainpower behind them.

p.s. - if this is not the right forum, please feel free to close the case, or remove it all together

[fayerman-source]

What you got is a lead generation platform. @idanYouval

[IdanDeeto]

What you got is a lead generation platform. @idanYouval

It's a fair point, the way to make the site operative is by advertising lawyers, but it's not a bait and switch kinda thing. You can use the site, completely free, and get major legal advice without commiting to contacting a lawyer

[EmilyC-Dragon]

Flagging facilitation of unlicensed practice of law issue. Those of us who are members of state bars can be brought up on ethics violations for such facilitation. Since Mike is designed to be doing legal workflows specifically it is something creators should keep in mind.

[IdanDeeto]

Flagging facilitation of unlicensed practice of law issue. Those of us who are members of state bars can be brought up on ethics violations for such facilitation. Since Mike is designed to be doing legal workflows specifically it is something creators should keep in mind.

It is specifically designed for the non-mike target audience. Those who practice law should use approved tools like Mike, those who aren't can use caseodds.ai just like they would use Claude or Gemini.

[fayerman-source]

Flagging facilitation of unlicensed practice of law issue. Those of us who are members of state bars can be brought up on ethics violations for such facilitation. Since Mike is designed to be doing legal workflows specifically it is something creators should keep in mind.

It is specifically designed for the non-mike target audience. Those who practice law should use approved tools like Mike, those who aren't can use caseodds.ai just like they would use Claude or Gemini.

In which jurisdiction are you operating? If US-based, the biggest question is whether your platform provides legal information vs. legal advice. Case assessment sits closer to the advice side of that line, which is the riskier framing. Also worth knowing: if your monetization involves revenue share or per-case fees tied to attorney outcomes, that runs into fee-splitting rules with non-lawyers.

[IdanDeeto]

Flagging facilitation of unlicensed practice of law issue. Those of us who are members of state bars can be brought up on ethics violations for such facilitation. Since Mike is designed to be doing legal workflows specifically it is something creators should keep in mind.

It is specifically designed for the non-mike target audience. Those who practice law should use approved tools like Mike, those who aren't can use caseodds.ai just like they would use Claude or Gemini.

In which jurisdiction are you operating? If US-based, the biggest question is whether your platform provides legal information vs. legal advice. Case assessment sits closer to the advice side of that line, which is the riskier framing. Also worth knowing: if your monetization involves revenue share or per-case fees tied to attorney outcomes, that runs into fee-splitting rules with non-lawyers.

No monetization per case or fee splitting. It is just like Google - you see results and you see relevant ads. No case information is shared with the law firms. Caseodds.ai gives the user a prompt assistance. We know how to ask the AI models the right questions so he won't get bias results and to weigh across multiple models

Again, it's the "invert" -if you like - of Mike. Btw, i love the Suits refere, so if anyone has a name for me that refer to Mike and Harvey.