bug: Generated UI not treating custom ResourceTypes as resources

[BrettMerrick]

Describe the bug

The auto generated UI for script parameters where the parameter type is a custom resource type does not allow you to select or create a resource in the same way as it does for resource types from the Hub.

To reproduce

1. Create a custom resource type:docs
2. Create a script that uses the custom resource type as a parameter: docs

Expected behavior

When I add a custom resource type to a script as a parameter, I expect the generated UI to let me choose an existing resource of that type, or let me create a new one - like it does with resource types from the hub.

Instead it populates the UI with the object structure of the resource type.

Screenshots

No response

Browser information

Version 145.0.7632.117 (Official Build) (arm64)

Application version

CE v1.654.0-3-g2aef01d18c

Additional Context

No response

[diegoimbert]

I tested and it seems to work

[BrettMerrick]

Interesting! Must be something about the way I'm creating the custom resource types:

I'll do some more digging and report back in case anyone else has a similar issue...

[BrettMerrick]

Here is the json view of both resource types used in the screenshot above:

ApifyApiKey (built in)

{
  "type": "object",
  "order": [
    "api_key_header",
    "api_key_secret"
  ],
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "required": [
    "api_key_header",
    "api_key_secret"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "api_key_header": {
      "type": "string",
      "default": "",
      "nullable": false,
      "description": ""
    },
    "api_key_secret": {
      "type": "string",
      "default": "",
      "nullable": false,
      "description": ""
    }
  }
}

CMBConnectionStringRT

{
  "type": "object",
  "order": [
    "endpoint",
    "shared_access_key_name",
    "shared_access_key",
    "entity_path"
  ],
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
  "required": [
    "shared_access_key_name",
    "endpoint",
    "shared_access_key",
    "entity_path"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "endpoint": {
      "type": "string",
      "format": "uri",
      "default": "",
      "nullable": false,
      "description": ""
    },
    "entity_path": {
      "type": "string",
      "default": "",
      "nullable": false,
      "description": ""
    },
    "shared_access_key": {
      "type": "string",
      "default": "",
      "nullable": false,
      "password": true,
      "description": ""
    },
    "shared_access_key_name": {
      "type": "string",
      "default": "",
      "nullable": false,
      "description": ""
    }
  }
}

They look the same to me. Is there somewhere else I need to look?