I want to call out a major inconsistency in the tokenomics regarding the Juicebox Donors allocation.
I want to call out a major inconsistency in the tokenomics regarding the Juicebox Donors allocation.
Issue
The Uniswap CCA allocation (~8.35%) gets:
100% unlocked at TGE
No cliff
No vesting
Meanwhile, Juicebox Donors (~2.64%)—the people actually funding the project—are forced into:
Only 20% at TGE
3-month cliff
18-month vesting
Problem
This makes zero sense:
The CCA supply is also premine and also community-aligned, yet it’s treated as if it deserves instant liquidity with zero restrictions.
Donors, who literally bankroll early development, get locked up for almost 2 years, while Uniswap CCA walks away with immediate, unrestricted tokens.
Why are donors being punished while CCA is treated as the chosen one?
Questions That Need Clear Answers
Why does the Uniswap CCA category get 100% unlock while Donors are stuck with 21 months of restrictions?
What is the justification for putting donors at a disadvantage compared to a liquidity allocation?
Was this an oversight or a deliberate imbalance?
If CCA can be fully unlocked, why shouldn’t Donor tokens follow the exact same treatment?
Request
This needs to be addressed. Either:
Provide a clear rationale for why donors are vest-restricted while CCA is not,
or
Fix the inconsistency so Donors aren’t treated worse than a liquidity bucket.
Thanks.
I want to call out a major inconsistency in the tokenomics regarding the Juicebox Donors allocation.
I want to call out a major inconsistency in the tokenomics regarding the Juicebox Donors allocation.
Issue
The Uniswap CCA allocation (~8.35%) gets:
100% unlocked at TGE
No cliff
No vesting
Meanwhile, Juicebox Donors (~2.64%)—the people actually funding the project—are forced into:
Only 20% at TGE
3-month cliff
18-month vesting
Problem
This makes zero sense:
The CCA supply is also premine and also community-aligned, yet it’s treated as if it deserves instant liquidity with zero restrictions.
Donors, who literally bankroll early development, get locked up for almost 2 years, while Uniswap CCA walks away with immediate, unrestricted tokens.
Why are donors being punished while CCA is treated as the chosen one?
Questions That Need Clear Answers
Why does the Uniswap CCA category get 100% unlock while Donors are stuck with 21 months of restrictions?
What is the justification for putting donors at a disadvantage compared to a liquidity allocation?
Was this an oversight or a deliberate imbalance?
If CCA can be fully unlocked, why shouldn’t Donor tokens follow the exact same treatment?
Request
This needs to be addressed. Either:
Provide a clear rationale for why donors are vest-restricted while CCA is not,
or
Fix the inconsistency so Donors aren’t treated worse than a liquidity bucket.
Thanks.