Background Information
I wrote a small Ruby script to help me translate compound acronyms from my project's partner agencies.
For example:
Agency.translate("B&F-ASC, RACA")
=> "Budget & Finance, Reimbursable and Advanced Collection Agreement, Albuquerque Service Center"
I'm imagining this could be a useful Slackbot addition, looking something like: define <agency-acronym> <acronym(s)>, e.g. define USFS B&F-ASC RACA.
We could have a folder of YAML files that define acronyms for each agency, and having the agency acronym as the first input lets us scope the lookup more precisely.
Questions: Would this be a useful addition to the define command? If so, is the usefulness of this idea worth the effort?
Background Information
I wrote a small Ruby script to help me translate compound acronyms from my project's partner agencies.
For example:
I'm imagining this could be a useful Slackbot addition, looking something like:
define <agency-acronym> <acronym(s)>, e.g.define USFS B&F-ASC RACA.We could have a folder of YAML files that define acronyms for each agency, and having the agency acronym as the first input lets us scope the lookup more precisely.
Questions: Would this be a useful addition to the
definecommand? If so, is the usefulness of this idea worth the effort?