Admit capacity-only user project preflight - #415
Merged
Conversation
8Dionysus
force-pushed
the
codex/storage-project-reservation-auto-20260906
branch
from
September 7, 2026 04:02
3f8d7b5 to
13cbe08
Compare
8Dionysus
deleted the
codex/storage-project-reservation-auto-20260906
branch
September 7, 2026 04:05
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The storage preflight path treated ordinary user-owned project capacity as if it needed per-task host write orchestration. That made a capacity-only check depend on route orchestration and obscured the boundary between accounting and filesystem mutation.
Result
The source path now admits ordinary user project capacity through the shared reservation ledger while retaining a capacity-only boundary: the route records ownership and available capacity, but does not grant write permission or cleanup authority. Runtime errors still fail the gate, Vault archive handling remains separate, and the existing coverage and forecast paths stay intact.
The change is limited to the storage reservation/planning contract, CLI projection, public command contract, generated ABI, and focused tests.
Validation
allowwith no blockers, warnings, or manual review.Delivery boundary
The artifact receipt is recorded in
work/automatic-capacity-artifact-delivery-20260907.json. Installed delivery remains code-only and is gated on merged source parity; it does not expand policy, add owner-write routes, or claim public release trust.