Skip to content

docs: compare Nano with Python - #12

Closed
AdityaRajhans-07 wants to merge 1 commit into
AetherAI3:mainfrom
AdityaRajhans-07:docs/nano-vs-python
Closed

docs: compare Nano with Python#12
AdityaRajhans-07 wants to merge 1 commit into
AetherAI3:mainfrom
AdityaRajhans-07:docs/nano-vs-python

Conversation

@AdityaRajhans-07

@AdityaRajhans-07 AdityaRajhans-07 commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why does this change belong in Nano?

What changed?

Validation

  • Focused tests passed.
  • python -m pytest -q passed.
  • Documentation and examples match the shipped behavior.

Boundary check

  • The change preserves deterministic reference execution for identical graph/frame inputs.
  • The change does not bypass the host-owned DecisionGate or add external actuation to Nano source/runtime.
  • If this adds a strategy, it includes paired .nano and _ir.json files plus documented host signal conventions.

@AetherAI3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Closing as stale: red CI, untouched since Aug 13. Reopen from a fresh branch if the Nano-vs-Python comparison is still wanted.

@AetherAI3 AetherAI3 closed this Aug 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants