Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions docs/src/ptf-catalog/sources/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ Each page describes the source, scope, inputs, outputs, status, and limitations
| [Vereecken et al. soil-moisture retention regressions for Belgian soils.](./vereecken1989.md) | Belgian territory north of the river axis Samber and Meuse | 2 |
| [Wang et al. (2012), surface loess across China's Loess Plateau.](./wang2012.md) | Surface soils across the entire Loess Plateau, China | 1 |
| [Weber et al. (2020), compiled international soil hydraulic data.](./weber2020.md) | Portuguese, German, UNSODA, and Vereecken soil data collections | 1 |
| [Saturated hydraulic conductivity PTFs for the Loess Plateau of China.](./zhao2016.md) | Typical Loess Plateau of China, covering approximately 430,000 square kilometers. | 6 |
250 changes: 250 additions & 0 deletions docs/src/ptf-catalog/sources/zhao2016.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
---
# @generated by ptfkit-codegen; DO NOT EDIT.

title: PTF source zhao2016
nav-title: zhao2016
---

# Saturated hydraulic conductivity PTFs for the Loess Plateau of China.

## Source

Zhao, C., Shao, M., Jia, X., Nasir, M., & Zhang, C. (2016). Using pedotransfer functions to estimate soil hydraulic conductivity in the Loess Plateau of China. CATENA, 143, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.037

[DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.037](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.037)

## Scope

**Territory:** Typical Loess Plateau of China, covering approximately 430,000 square kilometers.

**Dataset:** 729 samples from 243 sites, sampled in 2012 at depths of 0-10, 10-20, and 20-40 cm. Each of 400 random calibration-validation splits used 583 development records and 146 validation records (Section 2.3.1).

## Functions

### `calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_1`

Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-1.

**Status:** `implemented`

**Prediction target:** Saturated hydraulic conductivity

#### Inputs

| Name | Type | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `bulk_density` | `number` | g/cm^3 | Observed range in Table 1: 0.97 to 1.79 g/cm^3. | Soil bulk density measured on undisturbed cores. |
| `silt` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 2.04 to 76.01 percent. | Silt content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |
| `clay` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 0.010 to 32.67 percent. | Clay content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |

#### Outputs

| Name | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `ks` | mm/min | Observed range in Table 1: 0.01 to 0.99 mm/min; not an output clamp. | Saturated hydraulic conductivity, measured by the constant-head method. |

!!! note

Highest-ranked fitted PTF, ranked by descending R-squared (Section 3.3).

!!! note

Uses Table 1 means and standard deviations for Jia et al. (2012) Equation 3 on both predictors and response, as a reviewed reconstruction.

!!! warning

The publication does not explicitly confirm Table 1 statistics as the fitted scaling constants or the application of response scaling. This reconstruction has not been verified against author software.

!!! warning

Observed ranges describe the sampled soils; predictions are not clamped.

### `calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_2`

Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-2.

**Status:** `implemented`

**Prediction target:** Saturated hydraulic conductivity

#### Inputs

| Name | Type | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `bulk_density` | `number` | g/cm^3 | Observed range in Table 1: 0.97 to 1.79 g/cm^3. | Soil bulk density measured on undisturbed cores. |
| `silt` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 2.04 to 76.01 percent. | Silt content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |
| `clay` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 0.010 to 32.67 percent. | Clay content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |

#### Outputs

| Name | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `ks` | mm/min | Observed range in Table 1: 0.01 to 0.99 mm/min; not an output clamp. | Saturated hydraulic conductivity, measured by the constant-head method. |

!!! note

Mean coefficients of the top 25 percent, ranked by descending R-squared (Section 3.3).

!!! note

Uses Table 1 means and standard deviations for Jia et al. (2012) Equation 3 on both predictors and response, as a reviewed reconstruction.

!!! warning

The publication does not explicitly confirm Table 1 statistics as the fitted scaling constants or the application of response scaling. This reconstruction has not been verified against author software.

!!! warning

Observed ranges describe the sampled soils; predictions are not clamped.

### `calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_3`

Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-3.

**Status:** `implemented`

**Prediction target:** Saturated hydraulic conductivity

#### Inputs

| Name | Type | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `bulk_density` | `number` | g/cm^3 | Observed range in Table 1: 0.97 to 1.79 g/cm^3. | Soil bulk density measured on undisturbed cores. |
| `silt` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 2.04 to 76.01 percent. | Silt content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |
| `clay` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 0.010 to 32.67 percent. | Clay content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |

#### Outputs

| Name | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `ks` | mm/min | Observed range in Table 1: 0.01 to 0.99 mm/min; not an output clamp. | Saturated hydraulic conductivity, measured by the constant-head method. |

!!! note

Mean coefficients of the top 50 percent, ranked by descending R-squared (Section 3.3).

!!! note

Uses Table 1 means and standard deviations for Jia et al. (2012) Equation 3 on both predictors and response, as a reviewed reconstruction.

!!! warning

The publication does not explicitly confirm Table 1 statistics as the fitted scaling constants or the application of response scaling. This reconstruction has not been verified against author software.

!!! warning

Observed ranges describe the sampled soils; predictions are not clamped.

### `calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_4`

Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-4.

**Status:** `implemented`

**Prediction target:** Saturated hydraulic conductivity

#### Inputs

| Name | Type | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `bulk_density` | `number` | g/cm^3 | Observed range in Table 1: 0.97 to 1.79 g/cm^3. | Soil bulk density measured on undisturbed cores. |
| `silt` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 2.04 to 76.01 percent. | Silt content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |
| `clay` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 0.010 to 32.67 percent. | Clay content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |

#### Outputs

| Name | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `ks` | mm/min | Observed range in Table 1: 0.01 to 0.99 mm/min; not an output clamp. | Saturated hydraulic conductivity, measured by the constant-head method. |

!!! note

Mean coefficients of the top 75 percent, ranked by descending R-squared (Section 3.3).

!!! note

Uses Table 1 means and standard deviations for Jia et al. (2012) Equation 3 on both predictors and response, as a reviewed reconstruction.

!!! warning

The publication does not explicitly confirm Table 1 statistics as the fitted scaling constants or the application of response scaling. This reconstruction has not been verified against author software.

!!! warning

Observed ranges describe the sampled soils; predictions are not clamped.

### `calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_5`

Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-5.

**Status:** `implemented`

**Prediction target:** Saturated hydraulic conductivity

#### Inputs

| Name | Type | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `bulk_density` | `number` | g/cm^3 | Observed range in Table 1: 0.97 to 1.79 g/cm^3. | Soil bulk density measured on undisturbed cores. |
| `silt` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 2.04 to 76.01 percent. | Silt content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |
| `clay` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 0.010 to 32.67 percent. | Clay content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |

#### Outputs

| Name | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `ks` | mm/min | Observed range in Table 1: 0.01 to 0.99 mm/min; not an output clamp. | Saturated hydraulic conductivity, measured by the constant-head method. |

!!! note

Mean coefficients of all 400 PTFs, ranked by descending R-squared (Section 3.3).

!!! note

Uses Table 1 means and standard deviations for Jia et al. (2012) Equation 3 on both predictors and response, as a reviewed reconstruction.

!!! warning

The publication does not explicitly confirm Table 1 statistics as the fitted scaling constants or the application of response scaling. This reconstruction has not been verified against author software.

!!! warning

Observed ranges describe the sampled soils; predictions are not clamped.

### `calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_6`

Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-6.

**Status:** `implemented`

**Prediction target:** Saturated hydraulic conductivity

#### Inputs

| Name | Type | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `bulk_density` | `number` | g/cm^3 | Observed range in Table 1: 0.97 to 1.79 g/cm^3. | Soil bulk density measured on undisturbed cores. |
| `silt` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 2.04 to 76.01 percent. | Silt content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |
| `clay` | `number` | % | Observed range in Table 1: 0.010 to 32.67 percent. | Clay content measured by laser diffraction using USDA taxonomy (Section 2.2.2). |

#### Outputs

| Name | Unit | Domain | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `ks` | mm/min | Observed range in Table 1: 0.01 to 0.99 mm/min; not an output clamp. | Saturated hydraulic conductivity, measured by the constant-head method. |

!!! note

Lowest-ranked fitted PTF, ranked by descending R-squared (Section 3.3).

!!! note

Uses Table 1 means and standard deviations for Jia et al. (2012) Equation 3 on both predictors and response, as a reviewed reconstruction.

!!! warning

The publication does not explicitly confirm Table 1 statistics as the fitted scaling constants or the application of response scaling. This reconstruction has not been verified against author software.

!!! warning

Observed ranges describe the sampled soils; predictions are not clamped.
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions docs/src/reference/c/functions.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -133,3 +133,9 @@ title: C function index
| [`calc_ptf_vereecken1989_detailed`](headers/vereecken1989.md#function-calc_ptf_vereecken1989_detailed) | Estimate van Genuchten parameters from nine particle-size fractions and particle-size distribution descriptors. | [`<ptfkit/vereecken1989.h>`](headers/vereecken1989.md) |
| [`calc_ptf_wang2012`](headers/wang2012.md#function-calc_ptf_wang2012) | Estimate saturated water content, field capacity, and saturated conductivity. | [`<ptfkit/wang2012.h>`](headers/wang2012.md) |
| [`calc_ptf_weber2020`](headers/weber2020.md#function-calc_ptf_weber2020) | Convert VGM parameters to Brunswick-VGM parameters. | [`<ptfkit/weber2020.h>`](headers/weber2020.md) |
| [`calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_1`](headers/zhao2016.md#function-calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_1) | Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-1. | [`<ptfkit/zhao2016.h>`](headers/zhao2016.md) |
| [`calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_2`](headers/zhao2016.md#function-calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_2) | Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-2. | [`<ptfkit/zhao2016.h>`](headers/zhao2016.md) |
| [`calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_3`](headers/zhao2016.md#function-calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_3) | Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-3. | [`<ptfkit/zhao2016.h>`](headers/zhao2016.md) |
| [`calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_4`](headers/zhao2016.md#function-calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_4) | Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-4. | [`<ptfkit/zhao2016.h>`](headers/zhao2016.md) |
| [`calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_5`](headers/zhao2016.md#function-calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_5) | Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-5. | [`<ptfkit/zhao2016.h>`](headers/zhao2016.md) |
| [`calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_6`](headers/zhao2016.md#function-calc_ptf_zhao2016_m2_6) | Estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity using reconstructed M2-6. | [`<ptfkit/zhao2016.h>`](headers/zhao2016.md) |
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions docs/src/reference/c/headers/ptfkit.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -37,3 +37,4 @@ This umbrella header aggregates every public ptfkit source header. Include an in
- [`<ptfkit/vereecken1989.h>`](vereecken1989.md) — Vereecken et al. soil-moisture retention regressions for Belgian soils.
- [`<ptfkit/wang2012.h>`](wang2012.md) — Wang et al. (2012), surface loess across China's Loess Plateau.
- [`<ptfkit/weber2020.h>`](weber2020.md) — Weber et al. (2020), compiled international soil hydraulic data.
- [`<ptfkit/zhao2016.h>`](zhao2016.md) — Saturated hydraulic conductivity PTFs for the Loess Plateau of China.
Loading