Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 5, 2024. It is now read-only.

Update decorator to 5.0.8#79

Closed
pyup-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
pyup-update-decorator-4.4.0-to-5.0.8
Closed

Update decorator to 5.0.8#79
pyup-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
pyup-update-decorator-4.4.0-to-5.0.8

Conversation

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR updates decorator from 4.4.0 to 5.0.8.

Changelog

5.0.8

Made the decorator module more robust when decorating builtin functions
lacking dunder attributes, like `dict.__setitem__`.

5.0.7

The decorator module was not passing correctly the defaults inside the
`*args` tuple, thanks to Dan Shult for the fix. Also fixed some mispellings
in the documentation and integrated codespell in the CI, thanks to 
Christian Clauss.

5.0.6

The decorator module was not copying the __module__ attribute anymore. Thanks to
Nikolay Markov for the notice.

5.0.5

Dropped support for Python < 3.5 with a substantial simplification of
the code base (now building a decorator does not require calling "exec").
Added a way to mimic functools.wraps-generated decorators.
Ported the Continuous Integration from Travis to GitHub.

4.4.2

Sylvan Mosberger (https://github.com/Infinisil) contributed a patch to
some doctests that were breaking on NixOS.
John Vandenberg (https://github.com/jayvdb) made a case for removing the usage
of `__file__`, that was breaking PyOxidizer.
Miro Hrončok (https://github.com/hroncok) contributed some fixes for the
future Python 3.9.
Hugo van Kemenade (https://github.com/hugovk) contributed some fixes for the
future Python 3.10.

4.4.1

Changed the description to "Decorators for Humans" are requested by
several users. Fixed a .rst bug in the description as seen in PyPI.
Links

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing this in favor of #80

@pyup-bot pyup-bot closed this May 16, 2021
@CarlosLannister CarlosLannister deleted the pyup-update-decorator-4.4.0-to-5.0.8 branch May 16, 2021 04:58
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant