BFO refactor: component bears disposition; system derived via has_part#1
Open
BFO refactor: component bears disposition; system derived via has_part#1
Conversation
BFO refactor: add HardwareComponent and derive system exposure via has_part
BFO refactor: move disposition bearer from system to component
Add ASK query for component-bearer risk traversal
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Additional Comments (1)
-
03_TECHNICAL_CORE/ontology/ARCO_core.ttl, line 82-95 (link)style: Missing
rdfs:labeldeclarations for newly introduced BFO terms:bfo:0000030(Object) andbfo:0000050(part of). These are used in the refactored code but lack the UI labels that other BFO terms have.
3 files reviewed, 1 comment
Amosk21
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2026
Grounds the ARCO value proposition in the #1 practitioner pain point: Annex III classification must be formally defensible to regulators, not just internally agreed upon. Uses remote biometric ID (financial services onboarding) as the example system — real Annex III 1(a) use case, immediately recognizable to bank compliance teams. Covers Art. 6, 9, 11, 49 requirements and maps each to ARCO outputs. No LLMs, no marketing copy — technical brief format for DPOs and counsel. https://claude.ai/code/session_01PPu9eEMgVSdr9XsdiFzcJz
Amosk21
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2026
- Add cco:prescribes triple to AnnexIII_Condition_Q1 instance so the regulatory condition is a proper DirectiveICE that prescribes the regulated process type (not just iao:0000136 aboutness) - Add check_regulatory_alignment.sparql: auditor traceability query confirming that the law and the provider's intended use spec both prescribe the same process type (the KPMG documentation alignment check) - Register query in run_pipeline.py, wire into summary and all_pass Also closes eu_ai_act_rules.md known issue #1: HighRisk_Determination_001 was already correctly typed as :HighRiskDetermination (stale issue). All 8 checks pass: SHACL, Traceability, Latent risk, Intended use, Annex III 1(a), Obligation, Reg. aligned, Entailment. https://claude.ai/code/session_01YVJmx34fxvhMop6UBXZfRB
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Internal refactor only: capability dispositions attach to component objects; system-level exposure is derived via has_part traversal (no change to external classification target).
Greptile Summary
Refactored ontology architecture to align with BFO best practices: capability dispositions now attach to
HardwareComponent(Object) instances rather than directly toSystem(Object Aggregate), with system-level exposure derived viahas_parttraversal.Key changes:
HardwareComponentclass as subclass ofbfo:0000030(Object) that bears capability dispositionsSystemclass to aggregate components viabfo:0000051(has_part) instead of directly bearing dispositionsSentinel_Camera_01now correctly bearsSentinel_FaceID_Dispositionand is part ofSentinel_ID_Systemdetect_latent_risk.sparqlquery implementing the new traversal pattern to detect biometric capabilitiesIssues found:
rdfs:labeldeclarations forbfo:0000030(Object) andbfo:0000050(part of) in ARCO_core.ttl (style issue)The refactor improves BFO compliance by ensuring dispositions inhere in material objects rather than aggregates, which is ontologically more correct.
Confidence Score: 4/5
Important Files Changed
Sequence Diagram
sequenceDiagram participant Reg as RegulatoryContent<br/>(AnnexIII_Condition_Q1) participant Sys as System<br/>(Sentinel_ID_System) participant Comp as HardwareComponent<br/>(Sentinel_Camera_01) participant Disp as CapabilityDisposition<br/>(Sentinel_FaceID_Disposition) participant Proc as OperationalProcess<br/>(Surveillance_Run_001) Note over Reg: is_about (iao:0000136) Reg->>Disp: references BiometricIdentificationCapability class Note over Sys,Comp: has_part (bfo:0000051) Sys->>Comp: aggregates component Note over Comp,Disp: bearer_of (ro:0000053) Comp->>Disp: bears capability disposition Note over Proc: Operational realization Proc->>Sys: has_participant (ro:0000057) Proc->>Disp: realizes (bfo:0000055) Note over Sys,Disp: SPARQL query traversal:<br/>System → Component → Disposition