add surface-level style bank - #51
Open
AnnaWegmann wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stacked on #49 (the diff shown is relative to it).
Adds six surface-level styles:
all_caps,lowercase,no_punctuation,exclamations,passive_voice,texting_abbreviations. Each is defined by example texts, like every other style. The examples live in a new file,diversify_text/styles/surfacebank.json(flatname → examples, no taxonomy), and are exported asSURFACE_STYLE_BANK.They are selected by name, e.g.
styles=["all_caps", "passive_voice"], and work like the unusual styles: no index, never picked byn. The zero-shot method does not get them (its styles are instructions, not example texts — and its own bank already hascapsandlowercase).The example texts are hand-written. If you would rather have examples derived from the old style bank's texts (the dict deleted in #48), that is a content swap in the JSON with nothing else changing.
Written by Claude and Anna