The loading-fit warning checks whether the selected movers and active pipe/fuel connections can fit around each machine's perimeter. It deliberately does not prove that belts and pipes can be routed to those positions.
Follow up with a separate build-side feasibility model for the route itself. Keep this outside the production LP.
Before implementation, define the supported layout assumptions:
- machine-row orientation and spacing;
- belt lanes, mixed goods, splitters, and underground reach;
- pipe ports and underground pipes;
- fuel and burnt-result paths;
- beacon/module spacing and direct insertion;
- when the answer is feasible, impossible, or unknown.
Acceptance criteria:
- reports route feasibility separately from capacity and perimeter loading fit;
- explains which assumption blocks a route;
- never presents a perimeter-position pass as a complete layout guarantee;
- remains a derived build recommendation and does not change solver rates.
The loading-fit warning checks whether the selected movers and active pipe/fuel connections can fit around each machine's perimeter. It deliberately does not prove that belts and pipes can be routed to those positions.
Follow up with a separate build-side feasibility model for the route itself. Keep this outside the production LP.
Before implementation, define the supported layout assumptions:
Acceptance criteria: