Skip to content

Add Delineate Hydrologic Features from Point Workflow - #8

Merged
swainn merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
feature/delineate-hydrologic-features-from-point-workflow
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

Add Delineate Hydrologic Features from Point Workflow#8
swainn merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
feature/delineate-hydrologic-features-from-point-workflow

Conversation

@Sonia-96

@Sonia-96 Sonia-96 commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add a SelectPointRWS(SpatialInputRWS) work flow step for Delineate Hydrologic Features from Point Workflow. The user needs to pick a point that has low elevation within the raster:

  1. Show the Input Raster, which is usually a DEM, and its legend on the map, so the user knows the elevation change of the area.
image
  1. Add a tooltip to show the elevation when the user hover over the Input Raster layer
image
  1. The user can only draw one point on the map. If they draw a new one, the old one will be removed automatically

  2. Data validation: the point must be within the raster

image

Output files look like as follows:

image

@swainn

swainn commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request

…rologic-features-from-point-workflow

# Conflicts:
#	pyproject.toml

Co-authored-by: swainn <5123221+swainn@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request

Merge conflicts resolved. The only conflict was in pyproject.toml where both branches added new workflow entries — kept both delineate_hydrologic_features_from_point and generate_tin.

Copilot AI requested a review from swainn September 1, 2026 04:05
@swainn
swainn merged commit ca4a563 into main Sep 1, 2026
2 checks passed
@swainn
swainn deleted the feature/delineate-hydrologic-features-from-point-workflow branch September 1, 2026 04:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants