Repository navigation
[Refactoring] - Eliminating Dead Code - #3316
Conversation
af2f999 to
42fed09
Compare
|
Hello, The code is there have it avaliable for both sqlalchemist and not sqlalchemist #3308 already handles this I believe, as there we will only have Sqlalachemist |
|
I just checked the removed code at the branch you mentioned but I didn't see the implementation using the removed function from here. Do you want to double check them and maybe even merge this to your branch if removing them makes sense. @dbeltrankyl |
|
Ah, I looked at the protocol stub only > get_last_job_data_dc_by_job_name_and_fail_counter this is what #3308 solves ExperimentHistory.get_finish_data_dc Is in both branches, right. They can be delete I believe, these are a left-over of some refactor of the log_recovery ( there where too many iterations on that place) thanks |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3316 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.17% 85.14% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 148 148
Lines 22132 22093 -39
Branches 3918 3918
==========================================
- Hits 18850 18810 -40
Misses 2521 2521
- Partials 761 762 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…since it has some tests it'll be removed too
42fed09 to
b35747f
Compare
@ntorqulu and I found some pieces of code that seems to be unused both at AS and API, since it has some tests it'll be removed too and hopefully it might help even if a bit with the time execution of the tests.
@dbeltrankyl I bieleve you might have done the refactor of this changes so could you confirm if it is okay to remove them?
Check List
CONTRIBUTING.md.pyproject.toml.CHANGELOG.mdif this is a change that can affect users.Closes #1234).