Skip to content

docs(spam-filtering): reject_envelope_protocol → reject_unexec_if (UnexecIf) - #1

Merged
secsovereign merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/reject-unexec-if-rename
Oct 6, 2026
Merged

secsovereign merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/reject-unexec-if-rename

Conversation

@secsovereign

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Docs lag after blvm-consensus ab9063d UnexecIf rename.

  • src/node/spam-filtering.md: MempoolConfig::reject_envelope_protocol → reject_unexec_if (prose + TOML example)
  • Note: reject_envelope_protocol still accepted as serde alias (blvm-primitives config.rs)
  • Section retitled UnexecIf (OP_FALSE OP_IF … OP_ENDIF)
  • Added sigop-adjusted vsize (bytes_per_sigop=20, reject >16,000) + script::templates (UnexecIf/NullData/data-like multisig) note — policy only, no consensus change

Verified against primitives reject_unexec_if and consensus ab9063d / mempool.rs:207. Review OK @ 3feef69.

Rename remaining Envelope Protocol labels to UnexecIf in spam-filtering
docs, and document mempool sigop-adjusted vsize plus script::templates
structural scans from consensus ab9063d (policy only).
@secsovereign

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Review: OK to merge (3feef69)

Docs match primitives reject_unexec_if + serde alias reject_envelope_protocol, and consensus ab9063d (sigop-adjusted vsize / script::templates). UnexecIf naming + legacy key note look right.

Self-approve blocked (PR under @secsovereign). Josh merge when ready.

@secsovereign secsovereign left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK to merge at 3feef69. Self-approve blocked — Josh merge when ready.

@secsovereign
secsovereign merged commit 27f6c6d into main Oct 6, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant