CEDA is a diagnostic framework, not a cosmological model. It does not propose new dynamics, introduce new fields, or compete with inflation or ΛCDM. Its sole purpose is to audit early-universe proposals by enforcing conservation-honest accounting and by distinguishing genuine physical mechanisms from descriptive bookkeeping.
CEDA does not answer what the early universe did.
It answers what a proposal is actually doing.
Many early-universe constructions generate inflation-like behavior only after reinterpretation: horizon reweighting, entropy language, effective stress–energy insertion, or privileged coarse-graining. These moves often survive casual checks while quietly shifting explanatory burden.
CEDA exists to expose that shift.
It provides a standardized way to ask:
- Where does the claimed dynamics actually live?
- What breaks when bookkeeping is no longer allowed to do physical work?
- Which degrees of freedom are genuinely dynamical, and which are descriptive?
-
Fill out a Model Card
templates/model-card.md -
Pass the Run Validity Gate
protocol/run-validity-gate.md -
Run diagnostics (in order):
tests/D1-horizon-reconfiguration-null.mdtests/D2-coarse-graining-stability.mdtests/D3-exchange-term-provenance.mdtests/D4-mechanism-audit.md
-
Record outcomes in a Diagnostic Report
templates/diagnostic-report.md -
Archive the completed run under:
audits/CEDA-XXX-<paper-or-class>/
That is the entire workflow. No interpretation after verdict.
audits/— completed audit runs (paper-level and class-level)framework/— CEDA principles, assumptions, glossaryprotocol/— run validity gate, verdict rules, no-rescue ruletests/— diagnostic tests (D1–D4)templates/— required Model Card and Diagnostic Report formatspaper/— canonical framework paper(s)sources/— source papers audited (PDFs)
Start with templates/, then protocol/run-validity-gate.md, then tests/D1-horizon-reconfiguration-null.md.
- Not a replacement for inflation
- Not an alternative cosmological model
- Not an observational framework
- Not a mechanism generator
CEDA does not judge whether inflation is correct.
It clarifies why inflationary models require real dynamics to work.
Status: External review / diagnostic test-ground
Scope:
CEDA audits inflation-adjacent early-universe proposals for:
- degree-of-freedom discipline
- conservation and exchange accounting
- coarse-graining stability
- mechanism vs reinterpretation clarity
If a proposal relies on hidden structure, retrospective reinterpretation, or privileged description to generate physical behavior, the audit will surface it.
What you do with that result is up to you.