Skip to content

Conversation

@Late-Chocolate
Copy link

@Late-Chocolate Late-Chocolate commented Jan 13, 2026

Lag mode
It has some bugs
@1zun4 required me to use PacketQueueManager, but after I used it, my lag mode caused post vl on grimac

@master7720
Copy link

why close?

@Late-Chocolate
Copy link
Author

Late-Chocolate commented Jan 13, 2026

2026-01-13.13-58-15.mp4

@1zun4
Copy link
Member

1zun4 commented Jan 13, 2026

Thank you. I will look into it soon.

@1zun4 1zun4 self-requested a review January 13, 2026 12:31
@Late-Chocolate
Copy link
Author

Late-Chocolate commented Jan 14, 2026

Finally I found the reason for the grim post vl problem: the frequency of the tick isn't synchronized with the frequency of the receiving of the ping packet.
The previous code causes the disordered receiving of queuing packets.

This comment was edited after I really understood tickhandler and TickPacketProcessEvent(really?)

@Late-Chocolate
Copy link
Author

Late-Chocolate commented Jan 15, 2026

I understood TickPacketProcessEvent wrongly.
In later tests, I found the frequency of this event wasn't the same as the frequency of the sending of the TickEnd packet, so I use tickhandler to decrease the lagticks now

Now I think that I really understand tickhandler and TickPacketProcessEvent(really?)

@MukjepScarlet
Copy link
Contributor

Not working? It just delays some tick of knockback.

@Late-Chocolate
Copy link
Author

Late-Chocolate commented Jan 16, 2026

Not working? It just delays some tick of knockback.

It is just delay velocity.
Why didn't I call it "delay velocity"? Because LiquidBounce has already had a delay velocity(very useless).

@MukjepScarlet
Copy link
Contributor

Current Velocity module doesn't have a Delay mode.

@Late-Chocolate
Copy link
Author

Current Velocity module doesn't have a Delay mode.

It isn't a mode, and it is a setting
屏幕截图 2026-01-16 191913

@6x68
Copy link
Contributor

6x68 commented Jan 17, 2026

this should be moved into a slider since it should bypass almost any server with the right values, and combining it with JumpReset reduces the amount of knockback you take.

@Late-Chocolate
Copy link
Author

this should be moved into a slider since it should bypass almost any server with the right values, and combining it with JumpReset reduces the amount of knockback you take.

It can't bypass polar: Unexpected pong response -1584 -1585 windows:0, but I can add the JumpReset setting to the lag mode

@Late-Chocolate
Copy link
Author

Waiting for merging

@MukjepScarlet
Copy link
Contributor

@1zun4 final decision

@MukjepScarlet MukjepScarlet added this to the 0.36.0 milestone Jan 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants