Skip to content

data(filecoin): add repair and funding tools - #3162

Open
edras-create wants to merge 2 commits into
Chain-Love:mainfrom
edras-create:bounty/filecoin-foc-explorers-20260824
Open

data(filecoin): add repair and funding tools#3162
edras-create wants to merge 2 commits into
Chain-Love:mainfrom
edras-create:bounty/filecoin-foc-explorers-20260824

Conversation

@edras-create

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Adds four active Filecoin Onchain Cloud tools across the services, SDK, and security catalogs:

  • Early Repair CLI for repairing and replicating PDP datasets affected by faulty providers.
  • Filecoin Pay Auction Bot for monitoring USDFC Dutch auctions and placing policy-controlled FIL bids.
  • Squid EVM Funding, a TypeScript library for planning and executing capped cross-chain token funding routes.
  • Session Key Registry for scoped, expiring dApp permissions and EIP-712 signature authorization.

The existing Filecoin Onchain Cloud provider is reused. The changes add 8 CSV rows with 58 populated cells and stay below the grant limits.

Type of change

  • Add data rows
  • Update data rows
  • Remove data rows
  • Schema change
  • Documentation/metadata only

Scope

  • Networks affected: Filecoin
  • Categories affected: services, SDKs, security
  • Additional notes: 4 canonical offers and 4 Filecoin listings; no schema or provider changes

Duplicate audit

  • Searched the current repository and all open and closed Chain.Love pull requests for repository names, package names, offer names, and proposed slugs.
  • No matching or competing entries were found.
  • A separate candidate set was intentionally excluded after finding it already claimed by open PR feat(filecoin): add Onchain Cloud analytics explorers #2933.

Sources

Validation checklist

  • I followed the Style Guide and Column Definitions.
  • I personally opened and verified every new link.
  • I confirmed the provider currently supports Filecoin and checked every changed cell against the official repositories.
  • Repository pre-commit validation passed, including CSV width, sorting, uniqueness, JSON generation, and schema checks.

This contribution was AI-assisted and manually source-checked against the official FilOzone repositories.

Optional

  • Rewards address (ERC-20): 0x60079059d9E623fC87b69124Ccb6E4671124a834
  • Twitter (X) post link: N/A

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Status Count
🔍 Total 4
🔗 Unique 4
✅ Successful 4
⏳ Timeouts 0
🔀 Redirected 0
👻 Excluded 0
❓ Unknown 0
🚫 Errors 0
⛔ Unsupported 0

Full Github Actions output

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Status Count
🔍 Total 4
🔗 Unique 4
✅ Successful 4
⏳ Timeouts 0
🔀 Redirected 0
👻 Excluded 0
❓ Unknown 0
🚫 Errors 0
⛔ Unsupported 0

Full Github Actions output

@USS-Supervisor USS-Supervisor left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verdict: COMMENT
Risk: LOW
Summary: I checked the added Filecoin SDK/security/service rows against the repository data model. The CSV widths are stable, git diff --check is clean, the added listing rows resolve to the new canonical !offer: slugs, existing Filecoin/Filecoin Onchain Cloud provider references are present, and I did not find duplicate slug or chain-logo issues.
Findings: No data-integrity findings from static review. I cannot approve this cycle because the current-cycle link-check run did not appear within the 5-minute budget after resetting check-links; the only observed clean run was the earlier stale 2026-08-24 15:03 UTC run.
Confidence: HIGH

@USS-Supervisor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi @eugene17kotov - this stale PR looks ready for reviewer action. Required CI is passing, and I do not see a current creator-side blocker. I requested your review; could you please take a look when you have a chance?

@USS-Supervisor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@eugene17kotov following up on this stale PR. Required CI is passing and I do not see a blocking review, so it still looks ready for reviewer action when you have a chance.

@USS-Supervisor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@edras-create this PR has been idle for more than 3 days after review feedback, and I do not see a newer commit addressing it. Please address the feedback and update the PR when ready.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants