data(algorand): add wallet and subscriber SDKs

[edras-create]

Summary

Adds canonical Chain.Love offer records and rewarded-network listings for actively maintained developer tools from official repositories.

This PR contains 116 populated data cells across 16 inserted CSV rows, below the grant-program limits.

Verification sources

• https://github.com/algorandfoundation/algokit-subscriber-py
• https://github.com/algorandfoundation/algokit-subscriber-ts
• https://github.com/algorandfoundation/asa-metadata-registry-ts
• https://github.com/algorandfoundation/ledger-algorand-js
• https://github.com/algorandfoundation/xchain-accounts
• https://github.com/algorandfoundation/xHD-Wallet-API-kt
• https://github.com/algorandfoundation/xHD-Wallet-API-swift
• https://github.com/algorandfoundation/xHD-Wallet-API-ts

Checks

• Confirmed the added slugs were absent from the current main branch and the audited open PR inventory before publication.
• Confirmed every CSV row matches its header width.
• Parsed all populated JSON-array cells.
• Preserved alphabetical slug order.
• Verified the branch diff contains only the intended CSV additions.

Reward address

0x60079059d9E623fC87b69124Ccb6E4671124a834

[github-actions]

Summary

Status	Count
🔍 Total	16
🔗 Unique	15
✅ Successful	16
⏳ Timeouts	0
🔀 Redirected	0
👻 Excluded	0
❓ Unknown	0
🚫 Errors	0
⛔ Unsupported	0

Full Github Actions output

[github-actions]

Summary

Status	Count
🔍 Total	16
🔗 Unique	15
✅ Successful	16
⏳ Timeouts	0
🔀 Redirected	0
👻 Excluded	0
❓ Unknown	0
🚫 Errors	0
⛔ Unsupported	0

Full Github Actions output

[USS-Supervisor]

Verdict: COMMENT
Risk: LOW
Summary: I checked the added Algorand SDK rows and canonical offers. The CSV widths are stable, git diff --check is clean, the eight new listing refs resolve to added !offer: slugs, the Algorand provider exists, and I did not find duplicate slug or chain-logo issues.
Findings: No data-integrity findings from static review. I cannot approve this cycle because the current-cycle link-check run did not appear within the 5-minute budget after resetting check-links; the only observed clean run was the earlier stale 2026-08-24 15:03 UTC run.
Confidence: HIGH

[USS-Supervisor]

Hi @eugene17kotov - this stale PR looks ready for reviewer action. Required CI is passing, and I do not see a current creator-side blocker. I requested your review; could you please take a look when you have a chance?

[USS-Supervisor]

@eugene17kotov following up on this stale PR. Required CI is passing and I do not see a blocking review, so it still looks ready for reviewer action when you have a chance.

[USS-Supervisor]

@edras-create this PR has been idle for more than 3 days after review feedback, and I do not see a newer commit addressing it. Please address the feedback and update the PR when ready.